This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
By Dr. Ken Broda-Bahm: Here’s a welcome development: The state of Maryland has embarked on a pilot program to test out the effects of expanded voirdire. In many parts of the country (looking at you, Arizona) the ability of litigants to explore and deselect jurors based on bias is being reined in, with some […]
The process of voirdire stands as the crucial pillar in the world of law. Voirdire is derived from an old French word “ to speak the truth.” If you are not familiar with what is voirdire in law, what its process is. Continue reading this blog and you will have an understanding of voirdire.
By Dr. Ken Broda-Bahm: Government regulators can often play a role in civil litigation. In some cases, they’re involved as parties. More often, however, their role is as a proxy.
By Dr. Ken Broda-Bahm: Yesterday, I spent the full day as a prospective juror at the Lindsey-Flanigan Courthouse in Denver. As you can tell from the fact that I’m writing about it, I did not get selected for the jury. Alas, I was just one of the many “gallery ghosts” watching as others were questioned, […]
This is also the reason the emerging trend of defense attorneys counter-anchoring in voirdire is ineffective and more likely counterproductive. Wasting critical voirdire time with priming and persuading. Ignoring the presentational dynamic of the corporate representative.
Oral VoirDire & Jury Selection: Confirmation bias can extend to oral voirdire and the process of jury selection. These predetermined expectations about what makes a good juror can skew how jurors are evaluated during jury selection, regardless of what the evidence collected during voirdire questioning suggests.
Oral VoirDire & Jury Selection: Confirmation bias can extend to oral voirdire and the process of jury selection. These predetermined expectations about what makes a good juror can skew how jurors are evaluated during jury selection, regardless of what the evidence collected during voirdire suggests.
Religion is an example of a issue that can be a factor that has to be dealt with both in voirdire as well as opening statement. The amount of the verdict you are seeking is another subject for opening statement as well as for voirdire. It can involve issues of appearance, past personal history or race.
If a trial lawyer goes into oral voirdire with an intuitive, rather than scientific, approach to jury selection, they will approach potential jurors with a predetermined set of expectations. In one study [2], attorneys were given juror profiles and asked to create an oral voirdire strategy based on those profiles.
Additionally, trial consultants may act as observers during voirdire. A trial consultant may provide advice on things like developing a set of questions to ask potential jurors. The questions may help an attorney decide how to accept certain arguments in a case.
Thus, if you tried to strike all Millennial’s during voirdire , you would need more peremptory challenges than are typically allowed! Thus, Millennial’s cannot be blamed for recent nuclear verdicts. This finding should actually be a relief given Millennial’s make up nearly a quarter of the population.
Rachel mentions the importance of getting to know your jury and not shying away from that, and boldly states, VoirDire/jury selection is the only chance youll have to get to know the deciders in your case! Theres always this cross-over between the facts and evidence and our beliefs. So all the data you can get is fantastic.
Rachel mentions the importance of getting to know your jury and not shying away from that, and boldly states, “ VoirDire/jury selection is the only chance you’ll have to get to know the deciders in your case! There’s always this cross-over between the facts and evidence and our beliefs. So all the data you can get is fantastic.
This means trial attorneys also feel that they can develop their own anecdotal and intuition-based strategies for oral voirdire, strategies that research has also found to be ineffective (as discussed in more detail in article two of our confirmation bias series). The results can also inform oral voirdire strategies.
This means trial attorneys also feel that they can develop their own anecdotal and intuition-based strategies for oral voirdire, strategies that research has also found to be ineffective (as discussed in more detail in article 2 of our confirmation bias series). The results can also inform oral voirdire strategies.
This means trial attorneys also feel that they can develop their own anecdotal and intuition-based strategies for oral voirdire, strategies that research has also found to be ineffective (as discussed in more detail in article 2 of our confirmation bias series). The results can also inform oral voirdire strategies.
Once those trends are determined, you are able to use that to your advantage once the VoirDire jury selection takes place on the actual day of the trial itself.
Greg Lambert 17:38 is the guide directed toward the the attorneys in VoirDire or is it the judge? So they pull those names, and randomly, so to speak, people receive summons. So it’s a guide. Who would be the best to receive this information?
formulate a voirdire plan and stop winging it.” Instead, I will ask the tough questions that illicit the uncomfortable, but necessary responses for me to effectively use my strikes. stop doing all the talking. stop giving the panel a civics lesson and thanking them for their doing their duty.
Despite the setback, he believes that AI could still play a role in legal defense and is becoming an invaluable tool for case evaluation, trial preparation, voirdire strategy, and jury selection. .” Browder had developed a system that would allow people to use arguments in court generated by artificial intelligence.
Despite the setback, he believes that AI could still play a role in legal defense and is becoming an invaluable tool for case evaluation, trial preparation, voirdire strategy, and jury selection. .” Browder had developed a system that would allow people to use arguments in court generated by artificial intelligence.
VoirDire Challenges: During jury selection, lawyers can challenge potential jurors who display strong biases resulting from media coverage. Addressing Media Bias: Strategies for Lawyers and Litigators: · Education and Awareness: Lawyers should educate jurors about the potential biases that can arise from media exposure.
Hypothesis testing in attorney-conducted voirdire. The wisest one in the room: How you can benefit from social psychology’s most powerful insights. Simon and Schuster. Greathouse, S. Kennard, J. B., & Kovera, M. Law and Human Behavior , 38 (4), 392. A hierarchy of expert performance. Darley, J.
Hypothesis testing in attorney-conducted voirdire. The wisest one in the room: How you can benefit from social psychology’s most powerful insights. Simon and Schuster. Greathouse, S. Kennard, J. B., & Kovera, M. Law and Human Behavior , 38 (4), 392. A hierarchy of expert performance. Darley, J.
By Dr. Ken Broda-Bahm: With fewer than 30 days to go until one of the most pivotal elections in our history, do you believe the polls? Many would say “No.” Even when our favored candidate is ahead, we all seem to believe that there is some built-in error in the surveys. People aren’t always willing […]
By Dr. Ken Broda-Bahm: It has become more commonplace to hear talk about a future of litigation without peremptory strikes. After all, Arizona in 2022 was the first state to eliminate strikes in all cases, and it may not be the last. California and Washington have moved to revised schemes for exercising strikes, relying not […]
By Dr. Ken Broda-Bahm: Early on in the jury selection process, the judge will often ask the panel, “We all know that jury duty can be inconvenient, but who believes they would experience an unreasonable hardship by serving in this case?” ” Hands will shoot up. In some cases, the claims make an obvious case for […]
Guest post by Josh Haby: When I received my jury summons a month or so ago, I was elated. But the feeling was brief, as I quickly concluded my service would likely end as quickly as it would begin. I’m a Litigation Consultant, I work for a law firm, I studied Psychology and Law, and […]
By Dr. Ken Broda-Bahm: I know, I know, there’s a very good chance that every election in your lifetime has been billed as the “most important election in your lifetime.” ” But when it comes to next week’s election, that hyperbole just might be justified — at least based on the way the country seems to […]
By Dr. Ken Broda-Bahm: Of all the areas of legal lore, perhaps none are more loaded down with mystique than jury selection. Attorneys with long experience will develop some pretty solid views, and those habits on who they’re looking to seat and who they’re looking to strike can create a baked-in preference independent of the […]
At this point, jury selection, commonly referred to as voirdire, will begin. VoirDireVoirdire is French and means “to speak the truth.” The process of voirdire or jury selection is to question jurors to determine their suitability for jury service.
The Court added: “[T]he [trial] court employed voirdire questioning meant to guard against improper bias in the jury. In so doing, the court used Appellant’s requested voirdire question verbatim.” Would your beliefs about abortion prevent you from giving a fair and impartial verdict in this case?’
A large group of potential jurors is summoned to court, where they are questioned to ascertain their suitability for impartial judgment – a phase known as voirdire. Voirdire directly influences the representativeness of a trial’s jury. A larger jury pool allows for a more thorough voirdire.
A large group of potential jurors is summoned to court, where they are questioned to ascertain their suitability for impartial judgment – a phase known as voirdire. Voirdire directly influences the representativeness of a trial’s jury. A larger jury pool allows for a more thorough voirdire.
Voirdire, the jury selection process allows judges to assess potential jurors for biases and dismiss those whose impartiality may be compromised. Furthermore, judges remain vigilant and ready to address potential conduct infringements as they arise.
Voirdire, the jury selection process allows judges to assess potential jurors for biases and dismiss those whose impartiality may be compromised. Furthermore, judges remain vigilant and ready to address potential conduct infringements as they arise.
By Dr. Ken Broda-Bahm: As the historic first (but not last) criminal trial of a former U.S. President was kicking off last week, Mr. Trump commented, “Jury selection is largely luck,” before moving on to his more familiar complaints about the unfairness of the venue, the charges, the judge, and the trial process as a […]
Voirdire and jury selection. Jury decision making: 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7 (3), 622–727. link] Kovera, M. Dickinson, J. J., & Cutler, B. Goldstein (Ed.), Handbook of psychology (Forensic psychology, Vol. Allport, G. Traits revisited.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content