Rebuttal Related Topics 
IP Watchdog
APRIL 3, 2022
2019), “confused the law” regarding a rebuttable presumption of nexus. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) for rehearing en banc after the court found its original patent claims unpatentable as obvious. Zaxcom argued that the CAFC’s precedent in Fox Factory, Inc. SRAM LLC, 944 F.3d 3d 1366 (Fed.
IP Watchdog
DECEMBER 2, 2024
As per the Lanham Act, suspension of use for a consecutive three years may create a rebuttable presumption of abandonment. Continued use of a trademark keeps the trademark alive and makes the trademark right stronger. In the below case, we will analyze the nuances of trademark abandonment from nonuse.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
IP Watchdog
MARCH 25, 2025
Filler, MD, PhD, JD, the unpaid expert who said he reached out proactively to conduct testing on Judge Pauline Newman pro bono in order to help resolve the impasse between Judge Newman and the Judicial Council, has filed a rebuttal to criticisms of his September 2024 report confirming Newman is fit to serve on the U.S.
The 10b-5 Daily
APRIL 15, 2025
The company responded to the report with a short press release deriding the report’s inaccuracies and then later issued a longer rebuttal. The company’s stock price declined during this period. ” The company’s press release generally rejected the report’s allegations.
E-Discovery LLC
JUNE 16, 2025
Although the Fourth Circuit permits a rebuttable presumption of relevance where willfulness or bad faith is shown, Ms. Prejudice exists only “where the party’s ability to present its case is compromised as a result of the missing evidence.” Moore made no such showing.
IP Watchdog
AUGUST 1, 2022
That triggered an immediate rebuttal from six associations representing research universities and hospitals (including the Bayh-Dole Coalition, which I lead) and another from the Licensing Executives Society, USA & Canada, Inc.
IP Watchdog
MARCH 20, 2022
2019), “confused the law” regarding a rebuttable presumption of nexus. Now, Zaxcom has petitioned the court for rehearing en banc, arguing that the CAFC’s precedent in Fox Factory, Inc. SRAM LLC, 944 F.3d 3d 1366 (Fed.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
119 
Let's personalize your content