IP Watchdog

APRIL 3, 2022

2019), “confused the law” regarding a rebuttable presumption of nexus. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) for rehearing en banc after the court found its original patent claims unpatentable as obvious. Zaxcom argued that the CAFC’s precedent in Fox Factory, Inc. SRAM LLC, 944 F.3d 3d 1366 (Fed.

Rebuttal 119

Rebuttal Precedent Technology Litigation 119

IP Watchdog

DECEMBER 2, 2024

As per the Lanham Act, suspension of use for a consecutive three years may create a rebuttable presumption of abandonment. Continued use of a trademark keeps the trademark alive and makes the trademark right stronger. In the below case, we will analyze the nuances of trademark abandonment from nonuse.

Rebuttal 111

Rebuttal Litigation 111

IP Watchdog

MARCH 20, 2022

2019), “confused the law” regarding a rebuttable presumption of nexus. Now, Zaxcom has petitioned the court for rehearing en banc, arguing that the CAFC’s precedent in Fox Factory, Inc. SRAM LLC, 944 F.3d 3d 1366 (Fed.

Rebuttal 105

Rebuttal Precedent Technology Litigation 105

WA Bar News

NOVEMBER 12, 2024

(ii) Unless these rules impose an earlier deadline, and in no event later than the deadline for primary or rebuttal expert witness disclosures imposed by a case schedule or court order, each party shall identify each person whom that party expects to call as a primary or rebuttal expert witness at trial, state the subject matter on which the expert (..)

Depositions 105

Depositions Discovery Objections Exhibits 105

Forensic Psychologist

JUNE 1, 2016

After the trial judge permitted prosecutors to subpoena their records, the defense was forced to call the two as witnesses in order to keep the prosecution from calling them as rebuttal witnesses. The Georgia Supreme Court ruling is HERE. My prior blog post on the case is HERE. A Fordham Law Review article on this topic is HERE.

Witnesses 40

Witnesses Rebuttal Subpoenas Court Rules 40

The Successful Lawyer

JANUARY 13, 2022

Visualize your rebuttal. Conclude by imagining your closing argument, packaging the story for maximum impact. See yourself delivering the argument in a strong and confident manner. Hear your opponent giving their argument as well. Feel the exhilaration of a satisfying result.

Cross-Examination 40

Cross-Examination Exhibits Rebuttal Closing Argument 40

IP Watchdog

DECEMBER 16, 2021

The past year has seen the implementation of brand-new trademark legislation, significant analysis of trademark liability for new technologies, renewed focus on the doctrine of initial interest confusion, the transformation of Nikes into “Satan Shoes,” the functionality of chocolate dipped cookies, and the end to a long-running case involving two multi-million (..)

Technology 124

Technology Rebuttal Litigation 124