This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Ken Broda-Bahm: Here’s a welcome development: The state of Maryland has embarked on a pilot program to test out the effects of expanded voirdire. In many parts of the country (looking at you, Arizona) the ability of litigants to explore and deselect jurors based on bias is being reined in, with some […]
By Dr. Ken Broda-Bahm: Government regulators can often play a role in civil litigation. In some cases, they’re involved as parties. More often, however, their role is as a proxy.
In the spirit of correcting past problems and forging new habits, here’s a list of litigation resolutions – from case intake to closing argument – to put your trial strategy either back on track or to keep it on track. Deposition practice is one of the most over-looked aspects of litigation preparation.
The Impact of Confirmation Bias on Litigation: Confirmation bias can have far-reaching implications throughout the litigation process, affecting both the assessment of evidence and the decision-making of jurors in critical and deleterious ways: Biased processing of evidence and information: This outcome is a central hallmark of confirmation bias.
In our previous article, Confirmation Bias : The Science Behind its Impact on Jury Selection and Litigation, we explored the concept of jury bias and its profound effects on jury selection and decision-making processes. Confirmation bias permeates the litigation process, affecting various stages, from trial preparation to jury deliberation.
In our previous article, “Confirmation Bias: The Science Behind its Impact on Jury Selection and Litigation ”, we explored the concept of confirmation bias and its profound effects on jury selection and decision-making processes. Hypothesis testing in attorney-conducted voirdire. References: Otis, C. Greathouse, S. Kennard, J.
Our consultants understand the stakes during complex litigation and will help you get more prepared and confident with your claim. Additionally, trial consultants may act as observers during voirdire. Hiring a Trial Consultant in El Paso If you have pending litigation, consider retaining the services of a trial consultant.
Third party litigation funding, lawsuit advertising, and plaintiffs’ lawyers’ courtroom tactics fuel the size and frequency of nuclear verdicts. Thus, if you tried to strike all Millennial’s during voirdire , you would need more peremptory challenges than are typically allowed!
This means trial attorneys also feel that they can develop their own anecdotal and intuition-based strategies for oral voirdire, strategies that research has also found to be ineffective (as discussed in more detail in article two of our confirmation bias series). The results can also inform oral voirdire strategies.
This means trial attorneys also feel that they can develop their own anecdotal and intuition-based strategies for oral voirdire, strategies that research has also found to be ineffective (as discussed in more detail in article 2 of our confirmation bias series). The results can also inform oral voirdire strategies.
This means trial attorneys also feel that they can develop their own anecdotal and intuition-based strategies for oral voirdire, strategies that research has also found to be ineffective (as discussed in more detail in article 2 of our confirmation bias series). The results can also inform oral voirdire strategies.
In this article we will lay the foundation for our deeper exploration of confirmation bias in jury selection and litigation , which will be covered in subsequent blog articles. Hypothesis testing in attorney-conducted voirdire. Simon and Schuster. Greathouse, S. Kennard, J. B., & Kovera, M.
This article will lay the foundation for our deeper exploration of confirmation bias in jury selection and litigation, which will be covered in subsequent blog articles. Hypothesis testing in attorney-conducted voirdire. The wisest one in the room: How you can benefit from social psychology’s most powerful insights.
I’m a Litigation Consultant, I work for a law firm, I studied Psychology and Law, and […] Guest post by Josh Haby: When I received my jury summons a month or so ago, I was elated. But the feeling was brief, as I quickly concluded my service would likely end as quickly as it would begin.
By Dr. Ken Broda-Bahm: It has become more commonplace to hear talk about a future of litigation without peremptory strikes. After all, Arizona in 2022 was the first state to eliminate strikes in all cases, and it may not be the last. California and Washington have moved to revised schemes for exercising strikes, relying not […]
Moreover, it explores the significance of scientific jury analysis in helping lawyers and litigators navigate the potential biases stemming from media exposure , empowering them to devise effective strategies. The Impact of Media Coverage: Media coverage plays a crucial role in shaping public perceptions of high-profile trials.
Litigants expect a fair trial, and introducing external evidence violates this expectation. Pronounced jury misconduct can lead to civil litigation. Voirdire, the jury selection process allows judges to assess potential jurors for biases and dismiss those whose impartiality may be compromised.
Litigants expect a fair trial, and introducing external evidence violates this expectation. Pronounced jury misconduct can lead to civil litigation. Voirdire, the jury selection process allows judges to assess potential jurors for biases and dismiss those whose impartiality may be compromised.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content