article thumbnail

What Objections May Be Raised to a Subpoena by a Non-Party?

E-Discovery LLC

July 22, 2024), the Court addressed the type of objections that a subpoenaed non-party may make. That was a novel issue in Maryland. The Court held “that [nonparty] TST had standing to challenge the subpoena on grounds that some of the requests were overbroad and not relevant to the subject matter involved in the divorce action.”

Subpoenas 130
article thumbnail

What “Expenses” Can a Non-Party Recover for Complying With a Discovery Subpoena?

E-Discovery LLC

20, 2024), the court addressed recovery of expenses by non-parties for responding to a subpoena. 45 (“Subpoena”) states: (b)(1) – Under some circumstances, witness fees and mileage must be paid. [1] It is alleged that the documents were then used by the mother in litigation against the sole member of OLPC. Fed.R.Civ.P.

Subpoenas 130
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

The Little Engine That Could – Discovery of Litigation Funding Denied

E-Discovery LLC

27, 2024), the court rejected defendant’s effort to discover documents sent by plaintiff to a litigation funder that permitted the lender to evaluate the value of plaintiff’s claims. Design sought and obtained litigation financing from Validity Finance. In Design With Friends, Inc. Target Corporation , 2024 WL 433114 (D.

article thumbnail

This New Catalog for Corporate Legal Teams (Or Any Legal Professional) Brings the Comical to Contracts

Law Sites

A slingshot for launching litigation? I mean, what litigator wouldn’t want the “Subpoena Supper Apron,” with the tagline, “I grill before I sue”? A remote-controlled race car that redlines documents? A “Yes, But …” button for testing out your legal theories?

Subpoenas 147
article thumbnail

Service of a “Preservation Notice” in the Forum District Does Not Confer Long-Arm Jurisdiction Over the Out-of-State Sender

E-Discovery LLC

“Preservation notices” are routinely sent to a potential opposing party in order to trigger the common-law duty to preserve potentially responsive information by putting the recipient on notice that litigation should be anticipated. Often, it may be necessary to send them to a potential litigant located in another State.

Subpoenas 130
article thumbnail

Possession, Custody, or Control of Responsive Information by States Suing Meta

E-Discovery LLC

The September 6, 2024, decision in In Re: Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Products Liability Litigation, 2024 WL 4125618 (N.D. Meta responded that Rule 34 requests were proper and it should not be forced to serve over 200 subpoenas under Rule 45. 2024), applies the “legal control” standard to Fed.R.Civ.P.

Subpoenas 130
article thumbnail

Privilege Objections Denied Without Prejudice

E-Discovery LLC

non-party TEDCO’s blanket privilege and work product objections to a subpoena were denied; however, it lived to fight another day because the denial was without prejudice to file supported objections after a “meet and confer.” Singleton, issued several non-party subpoenas, including one to ImpactHR. In Singleton v. The plaintiff, Ms.