IP Watchdog

APRIL 3, 2022

2019), “confused the law” regarding a rebuttable presumption of nexus. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) for rehearing en banc after the court found its original patent claims unpatentable as obvious. Zaxcom argued that the CAFC’s precedent in Fox Factory, Inc. SRAM LLC, 944 F.3d 3d 1366 (Fed.

Rebuttal 119

Rebuttal Precedent Technology Litigation 119

IP Watchdog

MARCH 20, 2022

2019), “confused the law” regarding a rebuttable presumption of nexus. Now, Zaxcom has petitioned the court for rehearing en banc, arguing that the CAFC’s precedent in Fox Factory, Inc. SRAM LLC, 944 F.3d 3d 1366 (Fed.

Rebuttal 105

Rebuttal Precedent Technology Litigation 105

IP Watchdog

DECEMBER 16, 2021

The past year has seen the implementation of brand-new trademark legislation, significant analysis of trademark liability for new technologies, renewed focus on the doctrine of initial interest confusion, the transformation of Nikes into “Satan Shoes,” the functionality of chocolate dipped cookies, and the end to a long-running case involving two multi-million (..)

Technology 124

Technology Rebuttal Litigation 124