IP Watchdog

APRIL 3, 2022

2019), “confused the law” regarding a rebuttable presumption of nexus. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) for rehearing en banc after the court found its original patent claims unpatentable as obvious. Zaxcom argued that the CAFC’s precedent in Fox Factory, Inc. SRAM LLC, 944 F.3d 3d 1366 (Fed.

Rebuttal 119

Rebuttal Precedent Technology Litigation 119

The 10b-5 Daily

APRIL 15, 2025

An ongoing issue in securities litigation is to what extent a short seller’s report can act as a corrective disclosure for purposes of establishing loss causation. The company responded to the report with a short press release deriding the report’s inaccuracies and then later issued a longer rebuttal. In Defeo v.

Rebuttal 182

Rebuttal Pleadings Litigation 182

IP Watchdog

MARCH 25, 2025

Filler, MD, PhD, JD, the unpaid expert who said he reached out proactively to conduct testing on Judge Pauline Newman pro bono in order to help resolve the impasse between Judge Newman and the Judicial Council, has filed a rebuttal to criticisms of his September 2024 report confirming Newman is fit to serve on the U.S.

Rebuttal 59

Rebuttal Litigation 59

IP Watchdog

MARCH 20, 2022

2019), “confused the law” regarding a rebuttable presumption of nexus. Now, Zaxcom has petitioned the court for rehearing en banc, arguing that the CAFC’s precedent in Fox Factory, Inc. SRAM LLC, 944 F.3d 3d 1366 (Fed.

Rebuttal 105

Rebuttal Precedent Technology Litigation 105

E-Discovery LLC

MARCH 3, 2025

At its most general level, the holding was that a litigant may not invoke the courts to assert their legal rights, then engage in extralegal conduct. In the Courts words, the sanction alleviated prejudice to the employer and signals to Campbell and other litigants that one must deal honestly before the courts. 25, 2025)(Bredar, J.),

Evidence 130

Evidence Discovery Affidavits Pleadings 130

IP Watchdog

FEBRUARY 25, 2025

Senators Chris Coons (D-DE) and Tom Cotton (R-AR) today introduced the Realizing Engineering, Science, and Technology Opportunities by Restoring Exclusive (RESTORE) Patent Rights Act of 2025, which would restore patent owners right to the rebuttable presumption that a court will issue an injunction upon a finding of patent infringement.

Rebuttal 82

Rebuttal Technology Litigation 82

WA Bar News

NOVEMBER 12, 2024

This article will explain the changes effected by the rule amendments and, with respect to CR 26, provide context considered by the Civil Litigation Rules Revision Work Group in drafting the proposed amendments to illustrate their impact. This is no different.

Depositions 105

Depositions Discovery Objections Exhibits 105