Remove Litigation Remove Precedent Remove Technology
article thumbnail

How is AI Used in Legal Technology?

Lawmatics

Predictive Analytics AI can predict case outcomes based on historical data and legal precedents to help lawyers and clients make more informed decisions about litigation strategies, settlement negotiations, and risk assessment. Lawmatics' new tool, LM[AI] , incorporates breakthrough technology to boost law firm efficiency.

article thumbnail

Uber Technologies – Another Hyperlink Decision

E-Discovery LLC

In In Re: Uber Technologies, Inc. Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation , 2025 WL 678543 (Mar. While production issues concerning hyperlinked or modern attachments have been extensively litigated, in this blog I discuss some related evidentiary issues. Lorraine v. 534, 538 (D. 2007)(Grimm, J.).

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Clearbrief CEO Jacqueline Schafer: Transforming Written Legal Arguments With AI

Attorney at Work

Jackie Schafer: I started out as a litigator at Paul Weiss, but spent most of my career in public service as an assistant attorney general, where I was regularly briefing and arguing cases before the state appellate courts in Alaska and Washington state. It is a much more streamlined process because it is using cutting-edge technology.

article thumbnail

SCOTUS, Vaccine Mandates and Patent Law: God Help Us

IP Watchdog

Is the Supreme Court competent to handle issues dealing with technology? In one decision, the Supreme Court will wax poetically about the need to adhere to precedent, and citing stare decisis, and then overrule well-established, 30-year-old Supreme Court precedent.

Precedent 131
article thumbnail

Judge Michel Implores Full CAFC to Fix ‘Fuzzy’ Rebuttable Presumption of Nexus Jurisprudence

IP Watchdog

9,336,307 for Engineering Emmy® and technical OSCAR award-winning wireless microphone technology, petitioned the U.S. Zaxcom argued that the CAFC’s precedent in Fox Factory, Inc. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) for rehearing en banc after the court found its original patent claims unpatentable as obvious. 3d 1366 (Fed.

Rebuttal 119
article thumbnail

Exploring the Differing Views of the ITC and CAFC on ETSI Licensing Declarations

IP Watchdog

Preceding the CAFCs decision was an Initial Post-Hearing Brief submitted by the Office of Unfair Import Investigations (OUII) in the matter ofCertain Mobile Phones, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same. Lenovo (United States), Inc.

article thumbnail

Amici for Apple Tell SCOTUS Federal Circuit’s Article III Standing Ruling Violates Precedent, Upsets Congressional Intent in Enacting AIA Trials

IP Watchdog

In mid-November, consumer tech giant Apple filed a petition for writ of certiorari asking the U.S. Supreme Court to review the Federal Circuit’s decision to dismiss Apple’s appeal of unsuccessful inter partes review (IPR) challenges to the validity of several patents owned by Qualcomm.

Precedent 105