IP Watchdog
JULY 19, 2023
A group of herring fishermen have filed their opening brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in a case that asks the Court to overturn its “Chevron doctrine,” which says courts should defer to administrative agencies’ interpretation of the statutes delegated to them. In the 1984 ruling in Chevron, U.S.A.,
IP Watchdog
AUGUST 22, 2022
VLSI Technology LLC, IPR2021-01229, filed their opening briefs. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director Review of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) institution decisions in OpenSky Industries, LLC v. VLSI Technology LLC, IPR2021-01064 and Patent Quality Assurance, LLC v.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
IP Watchdog
SEPTEMBER 10, 2024
Last week, independent inventor Carrie Hafeman filed an opening brief for the appellant at the U.S. The brief includes Hafeman’s most recent challenge to alleged abuses of Sotera stipulations by Big Tech firms working in concert to invalidate Hafeman’s claims.
Securities Docket
AUGUST 19, 2024
Additionally, a couple of years ago, I published Fact or Fiction: Flawed Approaches to Evaluating Market Behavior in Securities Litigation, which identified still more rules of thumb that judges have developed over time. Which is what I was thinking about when going over NVIDIA’s opening brief in NVIDIA Corporation v.
WA Bar News
DECEMBER 17, 2024
By the time I get into the meat of the argument, my view is that I should have heard what the litigants points are in the table of contents, and in the summary of the argument, and in the topic headings. Is the table of contents the very first thing that you read when you look at a brief?
WA Bar News
JUNE 11, 2024
That’s the word limit for opening briefs in Washington appellate courts. 2 Per brief. In litigation documents, visuals can focus attention in depositions or simplify data in briefs. BY JACLYN C. CELEBREZZE Twelve thousand. How can you cut through word count and make your writing memorable?
Practice of Law
OCTOBER 25, 2024
After the Supreme Court handed down a ruling on presidential immunity , Smith filed his opening brief to support the stance that the evidence his team wanted to use in their case against Trump did not violate the new rules. A trial date has still not been set, and this is not even the end of the immunity pre-trial litigation yet.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
95 
Let's personalize your content