Remove Litigation Remove Objections Remove Technology
article thumbnail

How Attorneys Can Use Legal Data for Strategic Law Firm Positioning

Attorney at Work

With the improved access to litigation data from numerous vendors in the exploding legal tech ecosystem, solo practitioners, small law firms, and regional and midsize firms can take advantage of insights from data to position themselves as leaders and market movers in their respective practice areas and jurisdictions.

article thumbnail

What Judges are really saying about Technology Assisted Review

Discovery Advocate

Since the first judicial opinion endorsing the use of Technology Assisted Review (or TAR) was written by Judge Andrew J. And just as courts would not prescribe the use of TAR, neither would courts hold that a party could not use it, even in the face of party objections.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

ROSS Cofounder Returns To Legal Tech with Startup Using AI To Surface Judges’ Decision-Making Patterns

Law Sites

Pictured above are cofounders Gettleman, Maxim Isakov , Bench IQ’s chief technology officer, and Ovbiagele.) ” Lawyers tend to use traditional legal analytics products at the front end of a litigation, to help their clients determine whether it is worth investing in going forward with the case, he said.

article thumbnail

Project Management Tools for Attorneys

Attorney at Work

Offering a legal service is, of course, quite different from developing a new disinfectant, or building a software application or a material object. As law students, few litigators imagined themselves transitioning into project management roles after passing the bar. An Accidental Project Manager. A Powerful Project Management Panacea?

article thumbnail

Amendments to CR 26 and 30 Will Change Discovery and Deposition Practice

WA Bar News

1 The amendments to CR 26 affect objections, supplementation, and disclosure of experts. This article will explain the changes effected by the rule amendments and, with respect to CR 26, provide context considered by the Civil Litigation Rules Revision Work Group in drafting the proposed amendments to illustrate their impact.

article thumbnail

Li. v. Merck Addresses: Trigger; Spoliation Discovery; and, Document Unitization

E-Discovery LLC

In the first blog, I suggest that the Li court considered a subjective factor in an objective test. While Sedona correctly states that the test is whether a reasonable party in the same factual circumstances would have reasonably foreseen litigation, I have some questions about the Li Courts conclusion. What facts led Ms.

Discovery 130
article thumbnail

Five Key Points from the Invasion of Privacy Lawsuit Against OpenAI

IP Watchdog

While the Plaintiffs acknowledge in their complaint that Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to create life-saving technologies and herald discoveries that could improve our daily lives, they claim OpenAI crossed the line of using altruistic means of reaching its objective when it abruptly restructured itself into a for-profit business.