This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
states over talcum powder litigation marks a pivotal moment in consumer protection and corporate accountability. Cybersecurity, information governance, and eDiscovery professionals will find the developments in this case particularly relevant as they navigate the complexities of corporate litigation and regulatory compliance.
Engagement in proactive IP litigation by global companies is the bedrock of trademark enforcement, and Adidas is no stranger to this strategy. Since 2008, this athleisure accessories manufacturer has consistently protected its intellectual property by signing over 200 settlement agreements and fighting more than 90 court battles.
The Federal Circuit faulted the ITC for applying Step 1 of Alice/Mayo too narrowly in finding that the disclosed magnetic properties of the compound are side effects of the unclaimed manufacturing process and not physical characteristics of the compound itself.
In the past two months, I’ve heard the following stories from lawyers: A major manufacturer contacted a management-side labor lawyer for a large union-related issue after looking at his bio. A trusts and estates litigator received a call after the prospect did a simple Google search. What You Say and Post Online Does Make a Difference.
A large portion of the technology that we rely on daily—cell phones, computers, and the sensors and infrastructure that connect them, as well as an increasing percentage of drugs—is manufactured outside the United States, and in particular China. Indeed, over the past 25+ years the value of goods imported from China has increased ten-fold.
GlaxoSmithKline filed a four-count civil action for patent infringement in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware late last week seeking damages for Pfizer and BioNTech’s infringing manufacture, use, sale and marketing of both the original “monovalent” and “bivalent” Comirnaty COVID-19 vaccines.
The implications for civil litigation are obvious. This has led to litigation. But without a national standard, the regulatory push and consumer-led litigation automakers face will continue on “different tracks,” Baker said…. The EFF blog also provides links to privacy request pages for major manufacturers and other suggestions.
Last week, the United States Solicitor General recommended granting review in American Axle & Manufacturing v. Neapco Holdings, a case many in the patent community hope will provide clarity on U.S. patent eligibility law. patent eligibility.
states over the drug manufacturer’s alleged role in spreading opioid addiction across the United States, New York Attorney General Letitia James said on Friday. Indivior reached an $86 million settlement with 16 U.S. James said the settlement in principle concerned …
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit yesterday reversed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB's) finding that Campbell Soup Company, Campbell Sales Company, and Trinity Manufacturing, LLC did not demonstrate the claimed designs of Gamon, Inc.’s s design patents would have been obvious over the prior art.
That statement argued that Moderna should be released from infringement liability under the terms of a government contract that “authorize[d] and consent[ed] to all use and manufacture” of any U.S. patented invention.
20, 2024), the court stated that Michael Luttrell was killed while operating a Doosan PUMA V400 Vertical Turning Center machine at an Ace Manufacturing facility. The initial question may be whether litigation was reasonably anticipated. DN Solutions America Corporation , 2024 WL 4836017 (E.D. His wife sued multiple defendants.
manufacturing. I argued in “The Made in China Act,” November 16, 2022, that juries are not an effective or reliable check on patent validity and that eliminating contested validity reviews at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) would be a disaster for U.S.
Solicitor General on Wednesday filed an amicus brief with the United States Supreme Court advising it to grant Teva Pharmaceuticals’ petition for writ of certiorari relating to generic manufacturers’ liability for infringement through the use of “skinny labels” on generic drugs. The SG’s brief said that the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director Kathi Vidal vacated and remanded a decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) on Friday that had denied institution of an inter partes review (IPR) requested by auto parts manufacturer, Mahle Behr Charleston, Inc.
Similarly, a car manufacturer can simply rely on communication technologies developed by telecom experts outside the automotive ecosystem to guarantee connectivity to its fleet and the corresponding massive economic benefits.
The world’s best-selling drug, Humira, brought in $16 billion in sales in 2019 and Humira manufacturer, AbbVie, has obtained 130 patents on the drug, with 90% filed after Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. He said that nearly 40% of U.S. patients struggle to pay for medication.
A group of patent practitioners told the Supreme Court on Thursday that a case involving a patent for a type of content player would be a better vehicle for unraveling the patent eligibility problem than American Axle & Manufacturing v. Neapco Holdings, which has been awaiting a brief of the U.S. Solicitor General for about one year now.
The Federal Circuit’s denial of en banc rehearing and the Supreme Court’s denial of certiorari review mean the decision in American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. Neapco Holdings LLC, 967 F.3d 3d 1285 (Fed. 2020), is the latest word on subject-matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. §
In the case of In re: Paraquat Products Liability Litigation , MDL No. Plaintiffs in this MDL alleged that exposure to paraquat, manufactured by Syngenta and distributed by Chevron, led to the development of Parkinson’s disease.
Major companies across a variety of industries are pushing for a new federal rule of civil procedure regarding litigation funding. The idea is to promote transparency in litigation so that defendants have an idea of the outside groups that have a stake in the outcome of a given case. What Is Third-Party Financing?
In district court, there were two new IP Edge entities this week: Burley Licensing LLC [IP Edge] filed against Wal-Mart and Micro-Star International, while Shingletop IP LLC filed against Acer and Sun Cupid Technology, a Hong Kong-based device manufacturer.
That statement argued that Moderna should be released from infringement liability under the terms of a government contract that “authorize[d] and consent[ed] to all use and manufacture” of any U.S. patented invention. 1498, the statute governing remedies for patent infringements by government use.
filed suit against Chinese television manufacturer, TCL, through several of its affiliates and related entities, in the Eastern District of Texas for patent infringement. On April 21, 2022, LG Electronics Inc. See LG Electronics, Inc. TCL Electronics Holding Ltd. et al, Case: 2:22-cv-00122 (EDTX).
According to the letter, NHK-Fintiv practice has written vital protections intended by the America Invents Act out of the law without public notice or comment, and “has caused—and continues to cause—immediate and irreparable harm to American innovators and manufacturers.”.
The United States Solicitor General has recommended granting review in American Axle & Manufacturing v. Neapco Holdings, a case many in the patent community hope will provide clarity on U.S. patent eligibility law. The Supreme Court asked for the views of the Solicitor General in May of 2021 and the response has been highly anticipated.
CCIV is a SPAC that acquired Lucid Motors, an electric car manufacturer, in February 2021. District Court for the Northern District of California recently considered that question in In re CCIV/Lucid Motors Sec. 2023 WL 325252 (N.D.
If you manufacture a highly colorful product, are the owner of a well-known trademark, are an AI start-up company or are testing the waters as to whether a certain, unsavory word is protectable, pay attention to developments that have happened in just the first half of 2024. It has already been quite a year in the world of U.S.
In a second part of an article in the CLM publication ( “ Avoiding the Tentacles of Danger – The reptile evolves, part II: decoding plaintiffs’ attorneys’ tactics “ ), Courtroom Sciences consultants Steve Wood and Bill Kanasky take a look at what remains consistent in the plaintiffs’ litigation approach. Poor answer: Absolutely.
In the statement, the organization argues that “enshrining pharmaceutical companies’ demands in a pandemic treaty or other pandemic preparedness plans would normalize global inequalities and tie the hands of governments in future health crises.”
& Antitrust Litig. , Designated company representative(s) for Integra is/are expected to have information about the following topics related to the Subject Device: design, manufacturing, marketing, and distribution of the Subject Device, as well as the regulatory clearance of the SurgiMend® hernia mesh device by the U.S.
VP, Litigation & Employment Law , www.princetonlegal.com (Princeton, NJ). Regulatory Litigation Attorney , Southern California Edison (Hybrid Remote). Associate GC and Member Relations Executive , National Electrical Manufacturers Association (Arlington, VA). Director, IP Litigation , Inscripta, Inc. Boulder, CO).
A manufacturer of Radio Frequency Identification Device transponders (RFIDs), Avery Dennison Corporation, yesterday petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to grant certiorari in its appeal of a decision upholding ADASA, Inc.’s s patent for RFID technology as patent eligible.
The case, which was lodged by the pharmaceutical giant Bristol Myers Squibb (“BMS”) and consolidated with several other pharmaceutical challenges, alleges that the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) compels drug manufacturers to provide Medicare with “access” to their leading medicines at steep discounts, effectuating to an unconstitutional taking in violation (..)
Supreme Court is being asked to review, filed a reply brief on July 11 distancing its petition from that of American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc.’s, Interactive Wearables, the petitioner in yet another patent eligibility case that the U.S. s, which was denied certiorari on June 30, 2022. The brief characterizes U.S.
Teva Pharmaceuticals (2019), the Federal Circuit rejected Celanese’s contentions that statutory changes wrought by the America Invents Act (AIA) altered the on-sale bar such that sales of products manufactured by an undisclosed process would not invalidate patents claiming that process.
Although the “stump” art tool cited as prior art in Surgisil resembled Applicant’s lip implant (see below), the Federal Circuit found that Applicant’s “claim is limited to lip implants and does not cover other articles of manufacture.”
The Court found that free speech rights did not protect a manufacturer of dog toys, which mimicked a bottle of Jack Daniels, against an action for trademark infringement. On June 8, the United States Supreme Court handed down a surprisingly decisive ruling on trademark law and its relationship with First Amendment rights.
Plastipak’s 12 patents in suit generally had to deal with unfinished plastic bottles as used during manufacturing. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Premium Waters, Inc.
The ‘719 patent covers a method of manufacturing industrial steel. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) ruling upholding a district court’s grant of summary judgment that certain claims of Ficep Corporation’s U.S. Patent 7,974,719 (’719 patent) were patent ineligible under 35 U.S.C. §
Flygrip sued Amazon for direct and indirect patent infringement based on resale on Amazon’s platform of handheld-device cases manufactured by PopSockets, Otter Products and Quest USA Corp. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) today granted Amazon, Inc.’s District Court for the District of Colorado.
FCA US, LLC vacating the Eastern District of Michigan’s denial of permanent injunction against a redesigned version of an off-road vehicle manufactured by Mahindra. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued a decision in Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. The Sixth Circuit, in an opinion authored by Senior Circuit Judge Helene E.
Consider these examples: A person sues a manufacturer claiming that their product caused improbable injuries or damage. Ultimately, not only did he lose the case but a judge ruled that his litigation tactics were “beyond aggressiveness and crossed the boundary into abusiveness.” In other words, they can be a royal pain in the ….
Among those cases, note: Peter Pedersen has continued to add defendants to what promises to be a wide-ranging assertion campaign based on a single patent covering organizing email lists; Samsung has settled a tranche of IPRs against Trenchant Blade Technologies (associated with Tanit Ventures, Inc.,
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content