article thumbnail

When Can a Party Refer to Produced Records as an Answer to an Interrogatory?

E-Discovery LLC

Plaintiff contended that, in response to plaintiffs interrogatories, Defendants improperly refer to hundreds of pages of documents, which is non-responsive, evasive, and in violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33(d). First, it must show that a review of the documents will actually reveal answers to the interrogatories.

article thumbnail

Requests for Documents “Sufficient to Show,” Instead of “Any and All” Documents

E-Discovery LLC

The court wrote: “Thus, Defendants must produce documents sufficient to show their efforts to settle the ExWorks litigation….” For example, one litigant requested: “Documents sufficient to show Your liabilities from 2013 to the present on a monthly basis.” Their motion to compel was granted over relevance and other objections.

Discovery 130
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

All Metadata is Not Equal – Court Orders Narrower Request

E-Discovery LLC

“Parties should discuss how to produce the metadata and/or native files so that ESI maintains its integrity from when it is collected until when it is used in proceedings so that the parties have a method to confirm the integrity of the ESI throughout the litigation.” See The “Practical Ability” Standard for “Control” in Maryland (Dec.

Discovery 130
article thumbnail

Sometimes Discovery Disputes Do Not Bring Out the Best in Us – Part II

E-Discovery LLC

Nor is it a positive development when that court wrote: “Things have never exactly moved along at a break-neck pace in this litigation. The main topic here is ‘contention interrogatories’…. The court explained that: “A large portion of the parties’ dispute has to do with what a contention interrogatory can ask for.

Discovery 130
article thumbnail

Trellis Launches Trellis AI to Streamline Trial Court Litigation

Trellis AI leverages the largest repository of state trial court data to help litigators evaluate cases, automate brief drafting, suggest winning strategies, and more. Key Witnesses — Identify the people involved in the case and their roles to inform decisions about document requests, interrogatories, and depositions.

article thumbnail

StubHub: “The Court is not going to do that.”

E-Discovery LLC

In the latest iteration of In Re StubHub Refund Litigation , 2024 WL 3817068 (N.D. This is adversarial litigation, and there need to be clearly understood responsibilities. Litigation is designed to find the truth, but it is designed to find it in a particular way: adversarial testing. But that’s not true.” emphasis added].

Discovery 130
article thumbnail

Li. v. Merck Addresses: Trigger; Spoliation Discovery; and, Document Unitization

E-Discovery LLC

While Sedona correctly states that the test is whether a reasonable party in the same factual circumstances would have reasonably foreseen litigation, I have some questions about the Li Courts conclusion. Li to answer interrogatories asking if she or anyone else had deleted or destroyed any information requested in defendants discovery.

Discovery 130