article thumbnail

Man Takes a Spoonful of Medicine: Hearsay??

Evidence at Trial

Both the Federal Rules and California's Evidence Code define hearsay as a "statement" that is "offered to prove the truth of the matter" either "stated" (California) or "asserted" (Federal). And on most occasions, hearsay involves a "statement" as that term is generally understood. the existence of a headache] asserted.”

article thumbnail

Judicial Notice: Four Must-Know Rules

Evidence at Trial

One its expert witnesses walked the jury through powerful demonstrative evidence detailing DNA contamination in its crime lab. When asked to explain how, the defense attorney stated that in future cases, "the defendants' attorneys will simply ask the court to take judicial notice of the [expert witness'] testimony." Judicial notice?

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

California's Secondary Evidence Rule: Helpful, Yes. But Not an End Run.

Evidence at Trial

But this general rule of admissibility does not apply if the court finds either (1) a genuine dispute exists concerning material terms of the writing and justice requires its exclusion, or (2) admission of the secondary evidence would be unfair. Id , §1521(a)(1), (2).

article thumbnail

Livin' On The Edge: Steven Tyler and Party Admissions

Evidence at Trial

Code § 1200 ("'Hearsay evidence' is evidence of a statement that was made other than by the witness while testifying."). A common exception to the hearsay rule in California (and considered "not hearsay" in federal court) is the party admission. So is the evidence inadmissible?