This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a precedential decision in Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. The Federal Circuit remanded the case for further consideration of extrinsic evidence from chemistry textbooks to determine the proper meaning of the claim term “a pH of 13 or higher.”
International Trade Commissions economic prong analysis for the domestic industry requirement of Section 337, finding that petitioners at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board have no self-executing discovery obligations to present evidence from parallel ITC proceedings, and more; strong global demand for AI chips buoys Broadcoms first quarter results; (..)
District Court for the Southern District of Florida ruled against plaintiff Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc.’s In each of these opinions, the court noted the absence of survey evidence (or, in the Vital Pharmaceuticals case, the inadequacy of an “almost comically flawed” survey). On August 3, 2021, the U.S. On June 7, 2021, the U.S.
Vanda Pharmaceuticals filed the petition following the U.S. The CAFC came to its decision in part because the court said the disclosure of clinical trials was evidence that a person of ordinary skill in the art “would have had a reasonable expectation of success.”
You know, those touchpads that read your fingerprints to grant access to secure facilities like research labs, pharmaceutical companies, defense installations, and so forth.”. It’s time to offer a short bit of categorical evidence that a solution exists, then make your exit. Rachel: “Sounds exciting. What did you mean?
This case highlights critical issues surrounding product safety, transparency, and the ethical responsibilities of corporations, especially within the pharmaceutical industry. The broader implications of this settlement will likely influence similar litigations and regulatory practices in the pharmaceutical and consumer goods industries.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a precedential decision in Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. Earlier today, the U.S. Accord Healthcare, Inc. granting a petition for rehearing from appellant HEC Pharm Co.,
The CAFC found that the jury’s verdict with respect to written description was not supported by substantial evidence. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) today reversed a jury verdict for Juno Therapeutics and Sloan Kettering Institute for Cancer Research (Juno), wiping out a $1.2 billion judgment for the entities.
On July 7, 2023, the district court invalidated the patent for lack of written description despite rejecting an enablement defense based upon the same evidence.
The reality is that before a jury sees or hears any evidence, the judge first decides what the jury will see and hear. A preliminary fact is “a fact upon the existence or nonexistence of which depends the admissibility or inadmissibility of evidence.” ” Fed. ” Cal. Code § 400. See e.g. , Cal.
Opponents of capital punishment argue that the system is deeply flawed, with risks of wrongful executions, racial and economic biases, and a lack of evidence supporting its claim as a powerful deterrent effect. Fatal Flaws: The Case Against the Death Penalty. 9 III.B.
Beyond knowing the mechanics of the rules of evidence, effective advocates use the rules as weapons of persuasion. Equally important is the ability to adjust to the constantly changing landscape of admitted and excluded evidence. If a key piece of evidence is excluded, pivoting to "Plan B" is essential. Last month's Strobel v.
From the traditional focus on environmental and occupational hazards to the exploration of new frontiers in pharmaceuticals and consumer products. Cases related to pharmaceutical drugs, consumer products, and emerging contaminants in drinking water are gaining prominence.
All of these are major pharmaceutical companies with extensive histories and significant roles in the development, manufacturing, and distribution of medications – and one in particular: ranitidine. GSK still has not admitted wrongdoing, citing a lack of consistent evidence linking ranitidine to cancer. state courts.
As October 2024 concluded, it continues to be evident that the eDiscovery, cybersecurity, and information governance sectors are undergoing significant transformations. As AI becomes a critical tool in pharmaceutical innovation, it also presents challenges around data security, governance, and legal accountability. Read the update.
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) today jointly held an all-day listening session featuring speakers from patient advocacy and industry groups, academia, and brand and generic pharmaceutical companies who weighed in on the relationship between patents and affordable access to medicines.
What is inadmissible character evidence (Rule 404(a)) to one judge might be admissible "other acts" evidence (Rule 404(b)) to another. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. They and their parents sued Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. And when it comes to expert opinion testimony, there can be even more uncertainty.
The proponents promoting this hot house theory have seen it denounced by those who created the Bayh-Dole Act as being unauthorized under their law and seen evidence they can’t refute that it would have little impact on drug prices but would devastate small business entrepreneurs in all fields of federally supported research and development.
Unlike many purported disorders that are promoted by researchers or the pharmaceutical industry, sex addiction is a bottoms-up movement, with people self-diagnosing themselves via self-help books or quick-and-dirty Internet surveys.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content