article thumbnail

CAFC Reverses PTAB Patentability Finding in Campbell Soup Dispenser Case

IP Watchdog

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit yesterday reversed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB's) finding that Campbell Soup Company, Campbell Sales Company, and Trinity Manufacturing, LLC did not demonstrate the claimed designs of Gamon, Inc.’s s design patents would have been obvious over the prior art.

article thumbnail

Google’s Antitrust Ruling: A Landmark Decision that Signals Heightened Scrutiny for Tech Giants

Complex Discovery

Central to the ruling was Google’s use of exclusive contracts with device manufacturers and carriers to make its search engine the default on smartphones and web browsers. The court’s decision was based on evidence that Google’s practices violated Section 2 of the Sherman Act, which prohibits monopolistic practices.

Precedent 111
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Data Collection by Cars With Connectivity

E-Discovery LLC

They’re scanning for Teslas parked nearby, hoping their unique outward-facing cameras captured key evidence.” The agency warned car manufacturers earlier this year it “will take action to protect consumers against the illegal collection, use, and disclosure of their personal data.”

article thumbnail

TOOLMARK EVIDENCE: CAN’T LIVE WITH IT, CAN’T…

Temple University Beasley School of Law - Advocacy

Mistek et al, , Toward Locard’s Exchange Principle: Recent Developments in Forensic Trace Evidence Analysis, [link] (last visited July 17, 2023). The post TOOLMARK EVIDENCE: CAN’T LIVE WITH IT, CAN’T… appeared first on Advocacy and Evidence Resources. And beliefs should not be the basis for a criminal prosecution.

article thumbnail

Will Dobbs Cure the Plague of Patent Eligibility Nonsense?

IP Watchdog

That is, the DOJ and PTO now demand more subjective theory on Alice-Mayo while deliberately eschewing any objective basis for the test despite the fact that the claims in Bilski, Alice, and Mayo were considered abstract based on evidence in the record.

article thumbnail

Mechanical Engineering Expert Witness Testimony Allowed

Expert Witness Blog

The plaintiff claims that he was injured while using a miter saw manufactured by the defendant and purchased from Home Depot. The defendants allege that Dr. Benedict is not qualified to offer an opinion about miter saw design and manufacture, product warnings and instructions. Home Depot USA, Inc.

article thumbnail

USING A “REPTILE” STYLE OPENING STATEMENT

Plaintiff Trial Lawyer Tips

If the driver does not, even for an instant, and someone is hurt, the driver is responsible for the harm A manufacturer is never allowed to needlessly endanger the public. If they do and someone is hurt, they are responsible for the harm. THE STORY Now let me tell you the story (use the word story)of what happened here.