Remove Evidence Remove Litigation Remove Subpoenas
article thumbnail

What Objections May Be Raised to a Subpoena by a Non-Party?

E-Discovery LLC

July 22, 2024), the Court addressed the type of objections that a subpoenaed non-party may make. That was a novel issue in Maryland. The Court held “that [nonparty] TST had standing to challenge the subpoena on grounds that some of the requests were overbroad and not relevant to the subject matter involved in the divorce action.”

Subpoenas 130
article thumbnail

FTC and DOJ Update Guidance Regarding Preservation of Data from Collaboration Tools and Ephemeral Messages

Discovery Advocate

The updates reinforce the “longstanding obligation” to preserve and produce all responsive documents, including data from ephemeral messaging applications that allow messages to disappear or are designed to hide evidence.

Subpoenas 147
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Service of a “Preservation Notice” in the Forum District Does Not Confer Long-Arm Jurisdiction Over the Out-of-State Sender

E-Discovery LLC

“Preservation notices” are routinely sent to a potential opposing party in order to trigger the common-law duty to preserve potentially responsive information by putting the recipient on notice that litigation should be anticipated. Often, it may be necessary to send them to a potential litigant located in another State.

Subpoenas 130
article thumbnail

Defendant’s Failure to Preserve Surveillance Video Supports Waiver of Investigator’s Fact Work Product

E-Discovery LLC

Defendant Kroger moved to quash a subpoena served by the plaintiff, Mr. Whitmore, on a nonparty claims investigator, Sedgwick Claims Service. Because Kroger did not rely on the subpoena rule, Fed.R.Civ.P. Mr. Whitmore issued a subpoena to Sedgwick for email, communications, and video footage regarding the claim.

Subpoenas 130
article thumbnail

Possession, Custody, or Control of Responsive Information by States Suing Meta

E-Discovery LLC

The September 6, 2024, decision in In Re: Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Products Liability Litigation, 2024 WL 4125618 (N.D. Meta responded that Rule 34 requests were proper and it should not be forced to serve over 200 subpoenas under Rule 45. 2024), applies the “legal control” standard to Fed.R.Civ.P.

Subpoenas 130
article thumbnail

Citing the Correct Subsection of Fed.R.Evid. 502 is Important

E-Discovery LLC

In In re Outpatient Medical Center Employee Antitrust Litigation , 2024 WL 4679083 (N.D. Plaintiffs said that SCA was served with a copy of the subpoena on March 27 th , two days prior to serving it on Dr. Fanning and well before the deposition. 5, 2024), the court explained the application of Subsections (b) and (d) of Fed.R.Evid.

article thumbnail

Discovery Dispute: “Both cannot be true.”

E-Discovery LLC

Tekvantage and Teknowledgies are not parties to this litigation. Krantz issued third-party subpoenas to Tekvantage and Teknowledgies. ESI 101: Don’t Spoliate Evidence That’s Been Photographed (May 7, 2023)(defendants initially denied that a tablet existed; however, there was photographic evidence of it). [2]

Discovery 130