This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a precedential decision in Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. The Federal Circuit remanded the case for further consideration of extrinsic evidence from chemistry textbooks to determine the proper meaning of the claim term “a pH of 13 or higher.”
District Court for the Southern District of Florida ruled against plaintiff Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc.’s In each of these opinions, the court noted the absence of survey evidence (or, in the Vital Pharmaceuticals case, the inadequacy of an “almost comically flawed” survey). On August 3, 2021, the U.S. On June 7, 2021, the U.S.
Novartis is currently involved in a multi-district patent litigation campaign to block generic entrants for Entresto®, which is Novartis’ blockbuster heart medication. On July 7, 2023, the district court invalidated the patent for lack of written description despite rejecting an enablement defense based upon the same evidence.
This article offers a compelling overview of how blockchain is being adopted, its challenges, and what it means for the future of digital evidence and data security. Blockchain also aids in tracking pharmaceuticals to prevent counterfeit drugs, ensuring that only authentic medications reach patients.
Over time, legal frameworks developed to address these concerns, forming the foundation for contemporary exposure litigation. High-profile incidents, such as Love Canal and asbestos-related diseases, prompted regulatory changes and a surge in environmental and occupational health litigation.
The CAFC found that the jury’s verdict with respect to written description was not supported by substantial evidence. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) today reversed a jury verdict for Juno Therapeutics and Sloan Kettering Institute for Cancer Research (Juno), wiping out a $1.2 billion judgment for the entities.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a precedential decision in Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. Earlier today, the U.S. Accord Healthcare, Inc. granting a petition for rehearing from appellant HEC Pharm Co.,
Such capabilities are essential for addressing the challenges of cross-border litigation and vast data volumes, ensuring higher efficiency and accuracy. UnitedLex appointed Renee Meisel as its new CEO, signaling a shift toward bolstered leadership aimed at driving innovation across its litigation and compliance offerings.
All of these are major pharmaceutical companies with extensive histories and significant roles in the development, manufacturing, and distribution of medications – and one in particular: ranitidine. GSK still has not admitted wrongdoing, citing a lack of consistent evidence linking ranitidine to cancer. state courts.
states over talcum powder litigation marks a pivotal moment in consumer protection and corporate accountability. This case highlights critical issues surrounding product safety, transparency, and the ethical responsibilities of corporations, especially within the pharmaceutical industry. This multi-state settlement involves 43 U.S.
Beyond knowing the mechanics of the rules of evidence, effective advocates use the rules as weapons of persuasion. Equally important is the ability to adjust to the constantly changing landscape of admitted and excluded evidence. If a key piece of evidence is excluded, pivoting to "Plan B" is essential. Last month's Strobel v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content