This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Religion is an example of a issue that can be a factor that has to be dealt with both in voir dire as well as openingstatement. The amount of the verdict you are seeking is another subject for openingstatement as well as for voir dire. There are a variety of ways of going about this in the openingstatement.
Here are some thoughts about doing that There is a distinct connection of thought between evidence of cause and circumstantial evidence. See: Washington Pattern Jury Instruction 21.01 See: Washington Pattern Jury Instruction 21.01 Washington Pattern Jury Instruction 1.03
Decisions are not simply made on the basis of intellectual analysis of the testimony and evidence. The primary factors prevail over facts, evidence and logical reasoning. We should survey facts, case evidence and case issues through representative groups of people. JurySelection. OpeningStatement.
This involves reviewing all available documents, evidence, and witness statements. A good lawyer will create a case theory based on the case’s evidence and legal principles and present it clearly and concisely. Organize and Manage Evidence Efficiently organizing and managing evidence is crucial.
Openingstatement, witness examination & summation Depositions Review all depositions & index for access at trial Create summary of relevant testimony with index to access at trial Decide how to use at trial. . Index & make summary of relevant information for use at trial. Decide how to use at trial.
Demonstrating the testimony or evidence that supports the cross examiners case Obviously there are many sub categories under each of these topics plus other general goals depending upon the issues in the case, but these are the overall goals of cross examination. We all know the general goals of cross examination which include these: 1.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content