Evidence Expert Testimony Technology 
Complex Discovery
SEPTEMBER 11, 2024
Understanding how courts may handle AI-generated evidence will be crucial for those responsible for managing digital content, ensuring data integrity, and navigating complex litigation involving digital forensics. John Tunheim, delves into how the judiciary can prepare for the impact of AI-manipulated evidence. Grimm (ret.),
E-Discovery LLC
DECEMBER 9, 2024
Therefore, in his view, the evidence was not sufficiently authenticated. Mr. Reddick argued that the store employees testimony was insufficient for authentication, contending that the State had failed to establish a proper foundation showing the reliability of the process. Circumstantial evidence was sufficient. Lorraine v.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
IP Watchdog
APRIL 4, 2022
District Court for the Western District of Washington in an infringement suit brought by Genuine Enabling Technology (Genuine) against Nintendo Company and Nintendo of America (collectively “Nintendo”) for allegedly infringing certain claims of Genuine’s U.S. 6,219,730 (‘730 patent).
3 Geeks and a Law Blog
OCTOBER 16, 2023
She founded ClearBrief in 2020 to leverage AI to analyze documents and suggest relevant evidence and citations to streamline drafting. Younger associates and paralegals tend to be most enthusiastic about the technology while firm leadership lags. ClearBrief integrates into Microsoft Word to align with lawyers’ existing workflows.
CaseFox
NOVEMBER 27, 2023
Defendants deploy a range of strategies, from challenging scientific evidence to asserting assumptions of risk. Scientific Complexity Proving causation often involves navigating complex scientific evidence. Courts must assess the reliability of studies and expert testimony, posing challenges for both sides.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
111 
Let's personalize your content