Remove Evidence Remove Expert Testimony Remove Litigation
article thumbnail

Evidence that can prove business losses due to legal malpractice

Newport Beach California Business Litigation Law B

When attorneys fail to meet their obligations, it can result in major financial losses, such as significant revenue decline or business closure due to costly litigation or a damaged business reputation. If you are a business owner, what evidence do you need to confirm that legal malpractice caused your business to suffer losses?

article thumbnail

From Evidence to Misinformation: Courts Brace for Deepfake Challenges

Complex Discovery

Understanding how courts may handle AI-generated evidence will be crucial for those responsible for managing digital content, ensuring data integrity, and navigating complex litigation involving digital forensics. John Tunheim, delves into how the judiciary can prepare for the impact of AI-manipulated evidence.

Evidence 111
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Authentication of Surveillance Video by Lay Witness Under Silent Witness Doctrine

E-Discovery LLC

Therefore, in his view, the evidence was not sufficiently authenticated. Mr. Reddick argued that the store employees testimony was insufficient for authentication, contending that the State had failed to establish a proper foundation showing the reliability of the process. Circumstantial evidence was sufficient. Lorraine v.

Witnesses 130
article thumbnail

Request to Appoint Neutral Forensic Expert Denied as Speculative and Unsupported

E-Discovery LLC

24, 2025), the court imposed sanctions on a pro se litigant who, in the courts words, has engaged in unseemly behavior towards counsel as well as improper discovery litigation. In part, Mr. Rivera filed a motion to To obtain the appointment of a neutral expert in computer forensics. In Rivera v.

Discovery 130
article thumbnail

CAFC Vacates Section 112 Indefiniteness Ruling, Sending St. Jude Medical Back to Court

IP Watchdog

in which the court affirmed most of a ruling from the District of Minnesota, including sanctions against Niazi for improper use of expert testimony, as well as a finding of no induced infringement by St. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a precedential decision in Niazi Licensing Corp. Jude Medical S.C.,

article thumbnail

Relative Proportionality Argument Rejected

E-Discovery LLC

In the District of Maryland: “Unlike some other courts … this Court does not impose on the requesting party the burden of establishing the substantial similarity of the requested incidents and lawsuits subject at the discovery stage of the litigation. That is a very rigorous process, often necessitating expert testimony.

Discovery 130
article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Affirms Denial of JMOL, Partial Costs in Favor of Amazon

IP Watchdog

The CAFC said that substantial evidence supported the district court’s finding of anticipation, which Amazon proved via expert testimony relating to a prior art home automation software called HAL. infringed them, or, alternatively, a new trial.