Mon.Nov 20, 2023

article thumbnail

Justices Won’t Consider Whether CAFC’s Claim Construction Constitutes a Judicial Taking

IP Watchdog

The U.S. Supreme Court today denied a petition that asked it to consider whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s (CAFC’s) “construction of petitioner’s patent claim was unforeseeable and unjustifiable under the circuit’s prior decisions,” thereby constituting a judicial taking of property in violation of the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause.

article thumbnail

Fraud and Financial Crimes: Transforming Lives Through Client-Centric Law – Arun Chauhan – S7E29

Legally Speaking

How does one’s dedication to family and the simple joys of life add a refreshing perspective to the dynamic world of law? This week we’re super excited to be chatting with Arun Chauhan , the visionary founder of Tenet Law. With over two decades of experience in fraud and financial crimes, Arun has not only shaped the landscape of his sector but has also redefined the traditional legal model with his firm’s unique approach.

40
article thumbnail

Is It Time to Ditch the Requirement that Counterfeits be ‘Stitch-for-Stitch’ Copies?

IP Watchdog

The Lanham Act provides for special remedies in cases of trademark infringement “involving” the use of a “counterfeit” mark. 15 U.S.C. § 1117(b), (c); 15 U.S.C. § 1127. Absent “extenuating circumstances,” if the use of a counterfeit mark is intentional and knowing, the Act requires entry of judgment of three times the amount of actual damages or profits found, as well as an award of attorney’s fees. 15 U.S.C. § 1117(b).