Fri.Jul 05, 2024

article thumbnail

The “Silent Witness” Theory of Authentication of Video Evidence

E-Discovery LLC

The Supreme Court of Maryland is considering a challenge to authentication of video evidence using the “pictorial testimony theory.” See Authentication of Entire Video When Witness Observed Only Part of the Events Portrayed in the Video (Mar. 1, 2024). The “silent witness theory” was used in Cleveland v. State, 2024 WL 2149996 (Apls. Ct. Md. May 14, 2024)(unreported).

Evidence 130
article thumbnail

Journalism Industry Grapples with AI and Revenue Decline

Complex Discovery

Editor’s Note: The journalism sector stands at a critical juncture. The integration of AI technologies into newsrooms presents both transformative opportunities and formidable challenges. This article explores the intricate relationship between journalism and AI, focusing on the implications for content creation, intellectual property rights, and the sustainability of traditional media business models.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Love Beyond Bars: Miguel and Silvia

The Marshall Project

While Miguel Solorio did 25 years for a crime he didn’t commit, his wife, Silvia, was right by his side. Here’s their California love story in pictures.

104
104
article thumbnail

RockYou2024 Leak: Nearly 10 Billion Passwords Exposed, Heightening Cybersecurity Risks for Businesses

Complex Discovery

Editor’s Note: A significant cybersecurity incident has emerged with the leakage of the ‘RockYou2024.txt’ file, which contains nearly 10 billion plaintext passwords. The file, posted by a hacking forum user known as ‘ObamaCare’ on July 4, 2024, amalgamates passwords from both old and new data breaches. Researchers from Cybernews emphasize that this unprecedented leak magnifies the threat of brute-force and credential stuffing attacks, posing severe risks to online s

article thumbnail

Trial Prep: What Attorneys Really Want (And How to Deliver It)

Speaker: Joe Stephens, J.D., Attorney and Law Professor

Get ready to uncover what attorneys really need from you when it comes to trial prep in this new webinar! Attorney and law professor, Joe Stephens, J.D., will share proven techniques for anticipating attorney needs, organizing critical documents, and transforming complex information into compelling case presentations. Key Learning Objectives: Organization That Makes Sense 🎯 Learn how to structure and organize case materials in ways that align with how attorneys actually work and think.

article thumbnail

Other Barks and Bites for Friday, July 5: Texas Judge Puts Temporary Halt to FTC Noncompete Ban; FTC to Launch Investigation into Teva Pharmaceuticals Over Junk Patent Listings; WIPO Report Shows China is the World Leader in Generative AI Patents

IP Watchdog

This week in Other Barks and Bites: a Texas court dealt the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) a blow when it issued a preliminary injunction against the agency's proposed ban on noncompete agreements; the company behind President Trump’s shoe line filed a lawsuit accusing counterfeiters of trademark and copyright infringement; the FTC is set to start an investigation into Teva Pharmaceuticals after it refused to remove junk patent listings; WIPO released a report on generative AI showing China

article thumbnail

POSTMASTERS’ RIGHT TO RECOVER DAMAGES UNDER THE GLO COMPENSATION SCHEME DID NOT VEST IN TRUSTEES IN BANKRUPTCY

Civil Litigation Brief

Normally when this blog looks at issues relating to insolvency it relates to procedural or other practical problems arising when a party is made insolvent. The judgment of HHJ Cawson KC in Secretary of State for Business and Trade v.

64
article thumbnail

COST BITES 159: DEDUCTING COSTS FROM THE CLIENT’S DAMAGES: THE GOLDEN RULE – THAT THE CLIENT SHOULD BE KEPT INFORMED

Civil Litigation Brief

We are looking again at the judgment in St. James v Wilkin Chapman LLP [2024] EWHC 1716 (KB). The judge considered the question of whether the client had been informed that the budget had been exceeded and that the solicitors.