article thumbnail

What “Expenses” Can a Non-Party Recover for Complying With a Discovery Subpoena?

E-Discovery LLC

20, 2024), the court addressed recovery of expenses by non-parties for responding to a subpoena. 45 (“Subpoena”) states: (b)(1) – Under some circumstances, witness fees and mileage must be paid. [1] d)(3)(B) – A court may, on motion, ensure “that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated.” Fed.R.Civ.P.

Subpoenas 130
article thumbnail

What Objections May Be Raised to a Subpoena by a Non-Party?

E-Discovery LLC

July 22, 2024), the Court addressed the type of objections that a subpoenaed non-party may make. That was a novel issue in Maryland. The Court held “that [nonparty] TST had standing to challenge the subpoena on grounds that some of the requests were overbroad and not relevant to the subject matter involved in the divorce action.”

Subpoenas 130
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

No Need to Meet and Confer Before Motion to Quash Subpoena in District of AZ

E-Discovery LLC

29, 2024), Plaintiff Walker served a subpoena duces tecum on non-party JBHH, which had represented defendant AIU in workers compensation proceedings involving Mr. Walker. The subpoena requested a complete copy of the file in Mr. Walkers case. JBHH moved to quash the subpoena and also noted objections. 2024 WL 4607473 (D.

Subpoenas 130
article thumbnail

Discovery Dispute: “Both cannot be true.”

E-Discovery LLC

When it came to discovery, it wasn’t. Krantz issued third-party subpoenas to Tekvantage and Teknowledgies. While much of the Kranz & Associates decision focuses on a rejected assertion of spousal privilege in response to the subpoena to the husband’s company, this blog focuses on the Tekvantage subpoena to Ms.

Discovery 130
article thumbnail

You Subpoenaed My Documents, Shouldn’t You Pay for Them?

Percipient

Your company received a document subpoena in a legal dispute in which it is not involved. If the subpoena issued is in federal litigation, your company is likely responsible for the cost of compliance, especially if it has a connection to the litigation. Who covers the expense in responding to it? In United States v. 11 cv 4071 (N.D.

article thumbnail

The Little Engine That Could – Discovery of Litigation Funding Denied

E-Discovery LLC

It served a subpoena on Validity Finance, which then moved to quash it, arguing privilege and disproportionate burden. Third , the court wrote “[t]hat leaves Target’s request for documents about the relationship between Design and Validity and discovery about Validity itself. In sum: “Discovery requests can reach only so far.”

article thumbnail

Key COVID-19 Considerations for U.S. Discovery and Information Governance

Discovery Advocate

But we wanted to provide some concise guidance to help you think through the information governance and discovery challenges of unexpected large-scale remote access. Perfection in the discovery process is not required or possible. Don’t abandon your thoughtful discovery response programs. Reasonable and proportional efforts are.

Discovery 130