This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
7, 2025), the court addressed a number of discovery disputes in a lawsuit by a terminated employee against her former employer. In the first blog, I suggest that the Li court considered a subjective factor in an objective test. A second interesting aspect of Li is that the court permitted discovery relating to spoliation.
Since the first judicial opinion endorsing the use of Technology Assisted Review (or TAR) was written by Judge Andrew J. And just as courts would not prescribe the use of TAR, neither would courts hold that a party could not use it, even in the face of party objections.
Sometimes, an IT department moves slower than the average tortoise or routinely raises objections to what employees want. Sometimes those outside the IT department are pretty sharp technologically — and running shadow IT operations doesn’t intimidate them. Can’t You Control Shadow IT by Policies or Technology?
Discovery issues included, without limitation, whether email was discoverable, the late production by defendants of 80,000 responsive emails, proportionality, and a condemnation of boilerplate objections (called ipse dixit objections). I am going to follow this blog with several more blogs on older discovery decisions.
Offering a legal service is, of course, quite different from developing a new disinfectant, or building a software application or a material object. One column might be dedicated to deadlines, another to discovery tasks, another to trial preparation. Still, it is important to take stock of the demand for new legal technologies.
While the Plaintiffs acknowledge in their complaint that Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to create life-saving technologies and herald discoveries that could improve our daily lives, they claim OpenAI crossed the line of using altruistic means of reaching its objective when it abruptly restructured itself into a for-profit business.
This survey, now in its twelfth edition with 837 participants in the previous eleven editions, continues to serve as a vital benchmark, enabling legal professionals to make informed decisions that align with economic realities and strategic objectives.
Editor’s Note: The role of the Chief Technology Officer (CTO) has traditionally been focused on managing infrastructure, security, and compliance. However, as the legal technology landscape evolves, limiting the CTO to this operational scope risks stifling innovation and business growth.
Sedona Principle 6 is: Responding parties are best situated to evaluate the procedures, methodologies, and technologies appropriate for preserving and producing their own electronically stored information. His Honor added: Of course, the best solution in the entire area of electronic discovery is cooperation among counsel.
AI-enabled workflows are proving essential in addressing these issues by streamlining the discovery and review of electronically stored information (ESI). With AI-enabled workflows, legal professionals can overcome these challenges while accelerating and streamlining the discovery and review of electronically stored information (ESI).
Editor’s Note: From time to time, ComplexDiscovery highlights publicly available or privately purchasable announcements, content updates, and research from data discovery and legal discovery providers, research organizations, and ComplexDiscovery community members. 20-January-2023 Magnet Forensics Thoma Bravo Approximately $1.3B
Editor’s Note: Courts are sending a clear message: technical fluency is no longer optional in the world of modern discovery. He noted that while the rules haven’t changed dramatically, the technological context in which they operate has fundamentally transformed.
Plaintiff sought discovery of video footage “of an interaction” with her former manager and security personnel who had allegedly forcibly removed her from defendant’s premises. 4, 2023); Discovery About Discovery – When Was Duty to Preserve Triggered? Giant objected….”); Steamfitters Loc. Giant of Maryland, LLC , 477 Md.
Expert Panelist + Rene Novoa, CCLO CCPA, CJED Vice President of Forensics, HaystackID Rene Novoa has over 20 years of technology experience conducting data recovery, digital forensics, eDiscovery, and account management and sales activities.
Designed for legal professionals, technology innovators, and industry stakeholders, the report highlights the strategic drivers behind the sectors evolution. Proteus Discovery Group also made headlines with its acquisition of Novitas Data in September. May : Reveal acquired Onna Technologies, and Elevate acquired CJK Group.
In this column, we’ll address a narrower, but more common, subset of deposition misconduct that the ABA opinion touches on: improper “coaching” during depositions and improper objections intended to impede the questioner. All objections shall be concise and must not suggest or coach answers from the deponent. Washington RPC 4.4(a)
Remington objected, and appealed, based on its long-standing, neutral document destruction policy. 663, 679 (2012); Robert Hardaway, et al. , “E-Discovery’s Threat to Civil Litigation: Reevaluating Rule 26 for the Digital Age,” 63 Rutgers L. Is longer storage technologically feasible and is it proportionate to those risks?
During this period of adjustment, the review market may temporarily expand as providers begin experimenting with the technology, particularly for internal investigations and select cases. The adoption of GenAI is expected to be gradual, contingent on regulatory, judicial, and legal counsel (business and legal) acceptance. billion to $13.59
Editor’s Note: As the Russo-Ukrainian Wars large-scale phase enters its 1,018th day, the battlefield remains a dynamic and unforgiving theater of strategic maneuvering and technological innovation. Ukrainian Resilience and Technological Innovations Ukrainian forces, however, have maintained their resilience.
Industry Newsletter Five Great Reads on Cyber, Data, and Legal Discovery for February 2025 ComplexDiscovery Staff In February 2025, the digital world stands at a crossroads, where the promises of innovation clash with the ever-tightening grip of regulation and legal complexity. Innovation, however, continues to accelerate.
This edition is particularly noteworthy, given the increasing relevance of technologies like Large Language Models (LLMs) in shaping the future of eDiscovery. With growing interest in Generative AI and its potential impact on the field, this survey—conducted in collaboration with EDRM—provides timely insights into emerging trends.
Editor’s Note: The Russo-Ukrainian War continues to evolve with the integration of advanced technologies and innovative strategies, reshaping modern warfare. These developments demonstrate how advancements in strategy and technology are reshaping the war, setting the stage for continued conflict in the weeks to come.
This workshop will explore the real-world applications of AI, from early case assessment to document review, offering a comprehensive view of how legal teams can harness these technologies to improve their processes. Expert Panelists David R. She is the co-editor of the Thomson Reuters West Treatise: eDiscovery for Corporate Counsel.
Furthermore, it underscores the importance of digital expertise in uncovering and preserving evidence of war crimes and human rights abuses, showcasing how modern technology and professional skills are pivotal in addressing the multifaceted challenges of contemporary conflicts.
The narrative explores the transformative role of technological innovation in reshaping warfare, alongside updates on escalating territorial skirmishes and strategic maneuvers by both sides. Ukraines successful deployment of this technology reflects months of strategic innovation.
As AI technology continues to evolve, its potential for enhancing legal workflows is undeniable. Legal professionals, information governance experts, and eDiscovery specialists will find this development particularly pertinent as it navigates the balance between technological innovation and ethical accountability.
This unique background positions ComplexDiscovery to provide valuable insights for conflict-related investigations and litigation, where understanding the interplay of technology, data, and geopolitical factors is crucial. strategic objectives. ISW is a non-partisan, non-profit, public policy research organization.
citing Pouncing on Little Ambiguities Leads to Discovery Sanctions (Sept. Sometimes Discovery Disputes Do Not Bring Out the Best in Us (June 20, 2024). Another court imposed a limit in the midst of a dispute: “Saber objects to Larkin’s excessive use of footnotes. 1, 2024). NOSSK, Inc. May 11, 2022). Gill, et al.,
Permitting employees to use a company’s information technology system for personal purposes has long been recognized as fraught with hazards. HHI explained that when Mr. Shapiro was employed at HHI, he asked Mr. Hughey [HHI’s technology employee] to help him add his personal Gmail account to his work computers. 19, 2021). [1]
This unique background positions ComplexDiscovery to provide valuable insights for conflict-related investigations and litigation, where understanding the interplay of technology, data, and geopolitical factors is crucial. The Kremlin’s mobilization and recruitment efforts continue to face significant challenges.
The content is meticulously compiled from the Institute for the Study of War’s assessments, presenting an objective and factual narrative of the current military and geopolitical landscape. This lays the analytical foundation for understanding the reasons for particular developments and fulfilling their assigned research objectives.
This unique background positions ComplexDiscovery to provide valuable insights for conflict-related investigations and litigation, where understanding the interplay of technology, data, and geopolitical factors is crucial. Ukraine’s Anti-Drone Capabilities : Ukraine has continued to develop effective counter-drone technologies.
Manually managing discovery requests is one of the more time-consuming and tedious aspects of litigation. Discovery can suck up hours of billable time that can be better spent elsewhere. EsquireTek is an automation tool built for legal professionals to streamline the process of responding to discovery requests.
Editor’s Note: The convergence of artificial intelligence (AI) innovation and the rising energy demands of data centers presents a critical challenge for technology giants such as Google, Microsoft, and Nvidia. of global electricity demand in 2022, a figure expected to rise sharply as AI technologies proliferate.
This unique background positions ComplexDiscovery to provide valuable insights for conflict-related investigations and litigation, where understanding the interplay of technology, data, and geopolitical factors is crucial. strategic objectives. ISW is a non-partisan, non-profit, public policy research organization.
This unique background positions ComplexDiscovery to provide valuable insights for conflict-related investigations and litigation, where understanding the interplay of technology, data, and geopolitical factors is crucial. An investigation by the independent Ukrainian media organization Texty.org.ua
By doing so, it offers an objective lens into a conflict that continues to reshape regional and international security paradigms. This lays the analytical foundation for understanding the reasons for particular developments and fulfilling their assigned research objectives. strategic objectives.
This unique background positions ComplexDiscovery to provide valuable insights for conflict-related investigations and litigation, where understanding the interplay of technology, data, and geopolitical factors is crucial. strategic objectives. ISW is a non-partisan, non-profit, public policy research organization.
This unique background positions ComplexDiscovery to provide valuable insights for conflict-related investigations and litigation, where understanding the interplay of technology, data, and geopolitical factors is crucial. strategic objectives. This statement indicates that the U.S. Learn more, get involved, and contribute today.
For professionals in cybersecurity, information governance, and legal discovery operating within the eDiscovery ecosystem, tracking the monthly HSR transaction data, now enriched in this update with key economic indicators like GDP growth and corporate profits, offers critical insights. in the first quarter.
Led by Christopher Wall and featuring powerhouse experts from law, policy, and technology, this session explores the why and how of effective data minimization. She uses her unique expertise at the intersection of technology, data, and law to develop best practices and drive innovative workflows across many areas of the business.
Key findings from the Mashup reveal the profound impact of technological advancements , data proliferation , and changing task allocations on market dynamics. Leveraging data from historical studies, market modeling, and future forecasting, the Mashup offers actionable insights for legal, business, and technology professionals.
During the one-hour workshop, attendees will have a chance to learn about: The ongoing debate between Technology-Assisted Review (TAR) and GenAI, with insights into accuracy and efficiency. Ethical and legal challenges courts face regarding AI protocols, and how legal teams can navigate emerging discovery issues.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content