This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Under this model you establish a monthly rate and charge the client on an ongoing basis before the work is performed via an evergreen trust deposit replenishment. For instance, on the 1st of each month you charge the client a flat, consistent rate via a deposit to your trust account.
Since "deposition technology" is a relatively new space, I’ll cover some rules of thumb for evaluating new tools in a future post. A good place to start is to take advantage of new tools (and old rules – e.g., FRCP 30(b)(3) ) [iii] to create your own automated transcription and rough transcripts, versus buying them at “retail.”
I am obsessed with depositions and, in particular, their importance to the outcome of cases. That obsession extends to deposition data as well as to the psychology of the players involved: the attorneys taking and defending depositions; the witnesses being deposed; as well as the court reporters. Why on earth would we do this?
In litigation documents, visuals can focus attention in depositions or simplify data in briefs. Or take a Venn diagram of overlapping retail outlets in a trademark case. Anywhere the audience is making decisions. Across the board, legal documents are rife with opportunities to visually guide your audience.
The Court explained that “[b]ecause of this shared geological provenance, asbestos is often found intergrown as an ‘accessory mineral’ within a talc deposit.” Asbestos and talc are distinct minerals, but (1) they are closely related in their geological formation, and thus (2) are often found together in nature.
That’s the law firm side, the the corporate side, I think it’s a bit different because now corporate, you know, you saw some of the retail announcements of a of a some insurance companies having to restructure and start laying off some professionals and that sort of thing. And, you know, we’ll eventually get there. I think that is possible.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content