This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Plaintiffs did not disclose the identity of the consultant or the work performed; however, it came out in Dr. Singers deposition. Tesla moved to compel the whole ball of wax identity, a deposition, all documents and communications, invoices, etc. 26(a)(2) governs discovery of expert testimony. Plaintiffs offered half a loaf.
In this column, we’ll address a narrower, but more common, subset of deposition misconduct that the ABA opinion touches on: improper “coaching” during depositions and improper objections intended to impede the questioner. 10 Second, we’ll focus on depositions rather than hearings or trials. Washington RPC 4.4(a)
3, 2025), the court issued another hyperlinked document discovery decision arising out of the parties ESI Protocol. One More Thing to Consider Discovery is not an end to itself. Managing E-Discovery and ESI (ABA 2011), Chap. Berman, Use of ESI in Depositions, Chap. Managing E-Discovery and ESI (ABA 2011).
The outcome of this battle could set a critical precedent for how regulatory agencies engage with the rapidly evolving crypto market, impacting cybersecurity, information governance, and eDiscovery professionals. Paul Grewal, Coinbase’s Chief Legal Officer, emphasized the importance of these documents in a July 3 social media post.
AI helps legal professionals find relevant case law, statutes, and precedents by searching and summarizing vast legal databases. E-discovery. Some of the tasks CoCounsel can potentially manage include document review, legal research deposition preparation, and contract review. Legal research. Workflow automation.
Performing legal research and discovery. ChatGPT legal research can summarize cases, laws, deposition transcripts, or pleadings filed with the court. The application generally doesn’t explain, without specific prompting, how legal precedents were considered in its response. Transcribing voice and video recordings.
Paralegals Paralegals spend the bulk of their time on legal or case-related tasks, such as: Conducting legal research and discovery: Paralegals access databases and books to identify and document regulations and precedents that apply to a specific case. Below are the specifics of each role.
Their product suite now covers the entire litigation lifecycle, from intake to discovery to case management. And then we also, you know, we also have the capability to upload basically depositions, the videos, the transcripts, and annotate and collaborate on both the video and the testimony that becomes really, really important.
Also, identify any real-world legal precedents or principles this case might establish." Why It Works: This prompt provides context and specificity, enabling AI to help with initial case review, preliminary legal research, and identification of potential precedents.
FACTS In CT Install , defense counsel emailed plaintiffs counsel noting that discovery responses were overdue and asked when they would be served. Plaintiffs counsel responded that day that Plaintiffs would respond to the Discovery Requests by October 11, 2024. Both Rules permit stipulated extensions under Fed.R.Civ.P.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content