Depositions Discovery Evidence 
E-Discovery LLC
AUGUST 9, 2024
Plaintiff also presented a fall-back privilege log issue: “Plaintiff argues that if Defendant is permitted to withhold the video until after his deposition, he should be required to include more detail on his privilege log, including exact dates of surveillance and descriptions of the video(s)’ contents.” at *1 (citing cases).
E-Discovery LLC
AUGUST 14, 2024
defendant was sanctioned for belatedly canceling depositions that were scheduled at the discovery cutoff date. In this employment discrimination case, the defendant had noted depositions of Ms. Jones’ deposition. We notified you as soon as we learned the depositions would not be going forward.” 7, 2024)(Simms, J.),
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
E-Discovery LLC
DECEMBER 18, 2024
In response to the Taylor plaintiffs, Google challenged unreasonably broad demands for discovery on discovery, [that] are unsupported by any showing that relevant evidence is missing or that Googles production is deficient or otherwise improper. In my opinion, that omission was dispositive almost by itself. Grimm, Michael D.
E-Discovery LLC
SEPTEMBER 22, 2024
Among them were: general principles of discovery; the role of counsel in self-collection; discovery on discovery; the date that the litigation hold was triggered; whether reasonable post-trigger steps were taken; curative sanctions under Fed.R.Civ.P. It insists that it is not conducting unchecked discovery.”
E-Discovery LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2024
26, 2024)(unreported), dismissals for discovery violations were affirmed. Nguh, one owner, propounded discovery on Mr. Etame, the opposing owner. The Appellate Court wrote: Mr. Etame failed to respond to discovery, and on March 3, 2022, Ms. Etame did not appear for his deposition on March 10, 2022. As a result, Ms.
E-Discovery LLC
OCTOBER 17, 2024
11, 2024), involved a request for discovery from a former Town attorney concerning an offer that he allegedly made to plaintiffs. The court: set out the governing standard for discovery from an attorney and, denied a request to depose the attorney; but, authorized a limited interrogatory to him. Albra , 2024 WL 4471672 (S.D.N.Y.
E-Discovery LLC
OCTOBER 16, 2024
When it came to discovery, it wasn’t. RFP 1: “NO SUCH DOCUMENTS EXIST” Generally, when an attorney signs a discovery response under Fed.R.Civ.P. Discovery is the Lawyer’s X-Ray; However, an MRI May Not Be Reasonable (Sep. Discovery is the Lawyer’s X-Ray; However, an MRI May Not Be Reasonable (Sep. Lain’s entity.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
130 
Let's personalize your content