IP Watchdog

FEBRUARY 3, 2022

For a long time, the courts in England have been a forum of choice for the resolution of disputes between international parties, with the promise of an experienced judiciary and a cost-efficient approach to discovery and expert testimony.

Cross-Examination 69

Cross-Examination Expert Testimony Discovery Litigation 69

The Cloud Court Blog

FEBRUARY 24, 2023

What litigation teams need is an extra intelligence that can ingest enormous volumes of testimony data, organize it, and “push” intelligence to you. It takes testimony – from raw deposition and trial transcripts – across one or many cases and converts it into useful, actionable analysis reports that litigation teams can readily consume.

Depositions 52

Depositions Cross-Examination Witnesses Litigation 52

Evidence at Trial

SEPTEMBER 9, 2021

—exclude the opinion on the ground that it is fulfilling its gatekeeping role to "ensure that any and all scientific testimony or evidence admitted is not only relevant, but reliable." The Supreme Court granted review "in light of sharp divisions among the courts regarding the proper standard for admission of expert testimony."

Evidence 52

Evidence Expert Testimony Admissibility Cross-Examination 52

Temple University Beasley School of Law - Advocacy

JUNE 2, 2024

To ensure there is a foundation for the opinion rather than mere speculation, there is the testing device of cross-examination. But lay witnesses may not cross a line and give testimony that is “based on scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge within the scope of Rule 702.” The line is ill-defined.

Expert Testimony 40

Expert Testimony Witnesses Evidence Cross-Examination 40