article thumbnail

Tenth Circuit Reworks Opinion on Extraterritorial Reach of Lanham Act as Per SCOTUS

IP Watchdog

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit issued a revised opinion on Tuesday in the case of Abitron v. Hetronic, which was on remand from the Supreme Court’s June 2023 decision vacating a $96 million damages award for Hetronic. Abitron et.

article thumbnail

Ameranth Attempts to Bump Eligibility Issue Back to Top of SCOTUS’ Inbox

IP Watchdog

Supreme Court requesting review of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's (CAFC's) decision affirming a district court ruling that Ameranth’s patent was ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § Earlier this month, Ameranth Inc. filed a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the U.S.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Strobel v. Johnson & Johnson: Got a Hearsay Problem? Don't Give Up.

Evidence at Trial

Talcum powder is a talc-based cosmetic product, and it is manufactured by a milling process in which large pieces of talc ore are crushed and pulverized into fine-grained powder. The Court agreed that Dr. Longo's testing constituted inadmissible hearsay barred by People v. at 41 – 42.

article thumbnail

No mean feet obtaining a discovery order – Manolo Blahnik Worldwide Limited v Estro Concept Pty Limited

IP Whiteboard

BGL and its subsidiaries ( BGL Group ), including Manolo Blahnik, manufacture, distribute and sell luxury shoes and accessories bearing the “MANOLO BLAHNIK” name and brand, which are sold in over 65 countries including Australia. of the Federal Court Rules. the prospective respondent) in accordance with that rule.

article thumbnail

British Columbia Can Mount Opioid Class Action, Canada’s Top Court Says

Insurance Journal

The province of British Columbia can bring a class action lawsuit against pharmaceutical companies for opioid harms on behalf of multiple governments across Canada, the country’s Supreme Court ruled on Friday. In 2018, BC sued more than 40 drug manufacturers, …

article thumbnail

Who Are 'the People' Entitled to Bear Arms Under the Second Amendment?

Practice of Law

Applying Bruen , the court reasoned that Congress could not override the Second Amendment’s guarantee of the right to bear arms by declaring a group of people (drug users) to be dangerous. Without a historical analogue to support the restriction, prohibiting guns for drug users was unconstitutional , the court ruled.