Remove Court Rules Remove Evidence Remove Precedent
article thumbnail

Discretionary Stay of Discovery Pending Decision on Dispositive Motion

E-Discovery LLC

Defendants moved to stay discovery and asserted that courts stay discovery pending a fully dispositive motion, finding that judicial economy, the balance of hardships and equitable interests, and the lack of undue prejudice on nonmovants weigh in favor of a stay. cleaned up; citations omitted].

Discovery 130
article thumbnail

Uber Technologies – Another Hyperlink Decision

E-Discovery LLC

Uber also presents evidence that currently the production of hyperlinked non-Google Drive documents is not technologically feasible at scale. Plaintiffs did not dispute the evidence. The goal of document production, including production of ESI, is to develop admissible evidence for use at trial. Lorraine v. 534, 538 (D.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Coinbase Battles SEC Over Access to Gary Gensler’s Private Communications

Complex Discovery

The outcome of this battle could set a critical precedent for how regulatory agencies engage with the rapidly evolving crypto market, impacting cybersecurity, information governance, and eDiscovery professionals.

article thumbnail

Court Holds That an ESI Protocol Must be Specific in GenAI Copyright Class Action

E-Discovery LLC

The court anticipated a large volume of ESI in diverse forms and, citing precedent, wrote: An ESI protocol has to be specific or it doesnt mean anything. I see three takeaways from the courts decision. The courts expertise in ESI issues, for example, protocol design, is clearly evident. Emphasis added; cleaned up].

Discovery 130
article thumbnail

Protecting Public Expression

WA Bar News

In adjudicating the motion, the trial court was to determine whether the claim was based on an action involving public participation and petition. If so, the court then decided whether the plaintiff could prove by clear and convincing evidence a probability of prevailing on the claim. RCW 4.105.020(1). RCW 4.105.050.

Discovery 111
article thumbnail

Nokia and Amazon: A Patent Dispute Reshaping Tech Collaboration

Complex Discovery

For eDiscovery experts, the case illustrates the complex intersection of digital evidence, cross-border discovery, and the expanding scope of patent enforcement in cloud environments. What precedent does this set for hyperscale cloud providers seeking to avoid licensing fees for telecom-developed innovations?

article thumbnail

Deposition Misconduct: Rules, Risks, and Remedies

WA Bar News

should not be considered as evidence. a) prohibits a lawyer from using “means that have no substantial purpose other than to embarrass, delay, or burden a third person, or use methods of obtaining evidence that violate the legal rights of such a person.” Irwin (E.D. Washington RPC 4.4(a) Washington RPC 3.4(a)