E-Discovery LLC

JUNE 5, 2024

While there were many issues on appeal, one was whether evidence of her internet searches related to termination of a pregnancy was properly admitted on the facts presented. The decision to admit that evidence was affirmed by the intermediate appellate court. See Case No. The facts were awful. Akers was pregnant. On appeal, Ms.

Admissibility 130

Admissibility Evidence Voir Dire Objections 130

Complex Discovery

JULY 9, 2024

The outcome of this battle could set a critical precedent for how regulatory agencies engage with the rapidly evolving crypto market, impacting cybersecurity, information governance, and eDiscovery professionals.

Defense Strategy 114

Defense Strategy Precedent Discovery Depositions 114

E-Discovery LLC

JUNE 1, 2024

21, 2022), it addressed a novel issue and I wrote that: “In my view, the only error was that the appellate court did not publish its opinion so that it would be precedent.” In my opinion, the new Maryland Rule does not go far enough. Maryland Rule 8-605.1 That decision is “entirely” in the Court’s discretion.

Precedent 130

Precedent Discovery Admissibility Litigation 130

Practice of Law

OCTOBER 11, 2024

She first presented a sufficiency-of-the-evidence argument, claiming that the prosecution had not submitted enough evidence to the court to show that she had violated the law. The court will also consider whether the law is applied equally to men and women, addressing potential constitutional issues of equal protection.

Evidence 75

Evidence Precedent Court Rules Case Law 75

WA Bar News

JUNE 11, 2024

should not be considered as evidence. a) prohibits a lawyer from using “means that have no substantial purpose other than to embarrass, delay, or burden a third person, or use methods of obtaining evidence that violate the legal rights of such a person.” Irwin (E.D. Washington RPC 4.4(a) Washington RPC 3.4(a)

Depositions 96

Depositions Witnesses Objections Discovery 96

WA Bar News

JULY 10, 2024

In adjudicating the motion, the trial court was to determine whether the claim was based on an action involving public participation and petition. If so, the court then decided whether the plaintiff could prove by clear and convincing evidence a probability of prevailing on the claim. RCW 4.105.020(1). RCW 4.105.050.

Discovery 88

Discovery Pleadings Cross-Complaint Litigation 88

Practice of Law

SEPTEMBER 18, 2024

The plaintiffs claim that this extensive list lacks historical precedent and violates the Second Amendment, as interpreted by recent Supreme Court rulings, particularly New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. In deciding the case, SCOTUS established a two-step methodology for deciding Second Amendment challenges.

Precedent 40

Precedent Court Rules Evidence Litigation 40