Remove Court Rules Remove Discovery Remove Evidence
article thumbnail

Spoliation Discovery Permitted

E-Discovery LLC

7, 2025), the court addressed a number of discovery disputes in this lawsuit by a terminated employee against her former employer. The court permitted spoliation interrogatories. The Li court ruled that: The [court] GRANTS Defendants’ motion to compel and ORDERS Plaintiff to answer these rogs.

Discovery 130
article thumbnail

Discretionary Stay of Discovery Pending Decision on Dispositive Motion

E-Discovery LLC

Defendants moved to stay all discovery deadlines pending a resolution of their motion to compel arbitration and for a stay pending arbitration. The motion to stay discovery was granted. The Court wrote that: It is axiomatic that district courts enjoy substantial discretion in managing discovery. 26(c)(1)(A)-(B).

Discovery 130
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Another Approach to Drafting and Discovery of Litigation Hold Notices

E-Discovery LLC

As to one document, the Courts review of the substance of each of the redacted paragraphs makes clear that the letter involves the application of legal principles relevant to discovery and evidence preservation to guide the future conduct of Defendants. DISCOVERY OF LITIGATION HOLD NOTICES HAS LONG BEEN AN ISSUE.

Discovery 130
article thumbnail

From Evidence to Misinformation: Courts Brace for Deepfake Challenges

Complex Discovery

Understanding how courts may handle AI-generated evidence will be crucial for those responsible for managing digital content, ensuring data integrity, and navigating complex litigation involving digital forensics. John Tunheim, delves into how the judiciary can prepare for the impact of AI-manipulated evidence. Grimm (ret.),

Evidence 111
article thumbnail

Court States: Pick Up the Telephone

E-Discovery LLC

The court wrote: Here, the Court questions whether the parties have acted with sufficient diligence in pursuing discovery. The Jennings court discussed a series of discovery events, and added: The parties should be proactive in following-up with their discovery so as not to run into conflicts with the discovery cutoff.

Discovery 130
article thumbnail

Golden Oldie #1 – Is a Preservation Letter Necessary to Trigger an Opponent’s Duty to Preserve?

E-Discovery LLC

In Thompson II , certain defendants failed fully to produce emails after the Court ruled that they were discoverable. The Court entered one that would conditionally preclude defendants from calling certain witnesses unless they could demonstrate that the witness had not sent or received responsive emails. citation omitted].

Discovery 130
article thumbnail

How Not to Negotiate an ESI Protocol? Say it is “Mandatory”; and, Demand That Discussions be Recorded

E-Discovery LLC

20, 2025), the court wrote: From the inception of this action, Counsel for the parties could not agree on the scope and methodology for ESI discovery. Second , plaintiffs service of a mandatory discovery plan was held to show a lack of cooperation. 26(f) requires a conference of the parties to discuss a discovery plan.

Discovery 130