Protecting Public Expression
WA Bar News
JULY 10, 2024
If so, the court then decided whether the plaintiff could prove by clear and convincing evidence a probability of prevailing on the claim. First, the court agreed with the argument that “the narrow discovery envisioned in the UPEPA is inconsistent with the broad discovery permitted by CR 26, and the civil rules must be given precedence.”
88 
Let's personalize your content