E-Discovery LLC

APRIL 3, 2025

31, 2025), the court denied defendants request to stay discovery pending a ruling on defendants motion to dismiss the complaint. In denying the request to stay discovery, the Hernandez court first noted that it had wide discretion in controlling discovery. The stay was presented by plaintiffs motion to compel.

Discovery 130

Discovery Cross-Complaint Counterclaim Litigation 130

E-Discovery LLC

DECEMBER 16, 2024

26, 2024)(unreported), dismissals for discovery violations were affirmed. Nguh, one owner, propounded discovery on Mr. Etame, the opposing owner. The Appellate Court wrote: Mr. Etame failed to respond to discovery, and on March 3, 2022, Ms. Etame to submit any objections, which he did, with some discovery responses.

Discovery 130

Discovery Interrogatories Affidavits Pleadings 130

E-Discovery LLC

MAY 31, 2024

Defendants counterclaimed. This case is, in part, a trade secret case involving alleged misappropriation of source code, so requests seeking production of source code and related data are an expected part of discovery…. The court proceeded to resolve a number of other discovery issues. In Fiskars Finland OY AB v.

Interrogatories 130

Interrogatories Discovery Objections Counterclaim 130

Joshua Gilliland

JANUARY 30, 2016

The Court noted that many of the Defendants’ discovery requests were improper omnibus requests where no effort was made to tailor the discovery request to the issues in the case. The Plaintiff rightly objected to these requests, but made only improper boilerplate objections. Kissing Camels, at *5-6. Kissing Camels, at *8.

Objections 40

Objections Discovery Counterclaim Case Management 40