E-Discovery LLC

APRIL 3, 2025

31, 2025), the court denied defendants request to stay discovery pending a ruling on defendants motion to dismiss the complaint. In denying the request to stay discovery, the Hernandez court first noted that it had wide discretion in controlling discovery. The stay was presented by plaintiffs motion to compel. cleaned up).

Discovery 130

Discovery Cross-Complaint Counterclaim Litigation 130

E-Discovery LLC

DECEMBER 16, 2024

26, 2024)(unreported), dismissals for discovery violations were affirmed. Nguh, one owner, propounded discovery on Mr. Etame, the opposing owner. The Appellate Court wrote: Mr. Etame failed to respond to discovery, and on March 3, 2022, Ms. Etame to submit any objections, which he did, with some discovery responses.

Discovery 130

Discovery Interrogatories Affidavits Pleadings 130

IP Watchdog

MAY 4, 2023

The proposed rule changes would impact how respondents in CCB actions can assert counterclaims arising out of previous contractual agreements between parties to the action, as well as document production requests related to those counterclaims.

Counterclaim 64

Counterclaim Discovery Litigation 64

E-Discovery LLC

MAY 31, 2024

Defendants counterclaimed. This case is, in part, a trade secret case involving alleged misappropriation of source code, so requests seeking production of source code and related data are an expected part of discovery…. The court proceeded to resolve a number of other discovery issues. In Fiskars Finland OY AB v.

Interrogatories 130

Interrogatories Discovery Counterclaim Objections 130

WA Bar News

JULY 10, 2024

PURPOSE OF ANTI-SLAPP LAWS The purpose of anti-SLAPP laws is to prevent litigants from suing and threatening suit as a means of stifling speech on issues of public concern. It allows a defendant to bring an early summary judgment motion before conducting lengthy and expensive discovery. Expression Prot. Act prefatory note intro.,

Discovery 112

Discovery Pleadings Litigation Cross-Complaint 112

Joshua Gilliland

JANUARY 30, 2016

The Court noted that many of the Defendants’ discovery requests were improper omnibus requests where no effort was made to tailor the discovery request to the issues in the case. Binders in Everlaw grouping discovery responses. Kissing Camels, at *3-4, 7-9. Kissing Camels, at *5-6.

Objections 40

Objections Discovery Counterclaim Case Management 40

WA Bar News

JULY 10, 2024

Art assured them he could win the suit and would gain them two years by asserting every counterclaim he could think of and dragging out discovery as far as the court would allow. Months later Art was contacted by Bank wanting to retain him to evaluate the effect of the litigation against Becky and Clyde for their business financing.

Cross-Examination 52

Cross-Examination Admissibility Cross-Complaint Finance and Banking 52