Remove Construction Remove Evidence Remove Expert Testimony
article thumbnail

CAFC Judges Split on Indefiniteness Analysis for Identity Theft Patent

IP Watchdog

Judge Schall dissented-in-part, explaining that he would not have found the claims indefinite based on the intrinsic evidence. The parties mainly disputed two terms during claim construction: (1) “transaction partner” and (2) “OFF.” Mantissa sued First Financial Corporation and First Financial Bank, N.A. in the U.S.

article thumbnail

CAFC Overturns Win for Nintendo Based on District Court’s Incorrect Claim Construction Analysis

IP Watchdog

The CAFC reversed the district court’s summary judgment decision because the district court erred in its construction of “input signal” and should have construed the term to mean “a signal having an audio or higher frequency.”. 6,219,730 (‘730 patent).

article thumbnail

Relative Proportionality Argument Rejected

E-Discovery LLC

After setting out the boilerplate on scope of discovery and requirements for a protective order, the Court wrote: “The burden is on the party resisting discovery to explain specifically why its objections, including those based on irrelevance, are proper given the broad and liberal construction of federal discovery rules.”

Discovery 130