article thumbnail

eDiscovery Assistant Rebrands as Minerva26, Positions Its Platform as Strategic Discovery Command Center

Law Sites

eDiscovery Assistant, a platform for e-discovery case law and resources, today announced its rebranding as Minerva26. The platform, which provides a curated database of case law, […] The platform, which provides a curated database of case law, […]

Discovery 211
article thumbnail

4 E-Discovery Tips from Recent Case Law about New Data Types (Adv.)

InHouseBlog

Eight years on from the last set of major changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) governing e-discovery, you might think that the practice of e-discovery had settled down into a comfortable status quo. And all of these platforms are fair game for discovery. To keep up, they have to learn from case law.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Another Approach to Drafting and Discovery of Litigation Hold Notices

E-Discovery LLC

As to one document, the Courts review of the substance of each of the redacted paragraphs makes clear that the letter involves the application of legal principles relevant to discovery and evidence preservation to guide the future conduct of Defendants. DISCOVERY OF LITIGATION HOLD NOTICES HAS LONG BEEN AN ISSUE. Grimm (ret.)

Discovery 130
article thumbnail

Is a Court-Ordered ESI Protocol a Trap?

E-Discovery LLC

It is sufficient to resolve the current discovery dispute to observe that Meta’s privilege log does not satisfy paragraph 1 of appendix 2 of the ESI Order, and Meta has not filed a motion asking for relief from those requirements. This blog was initially posted on Electronic Discovery Reference Model. ESI Order ¶ 10.

Discovery 130
article thumbnail

“Boilerplate” Objections Are Generally Condemned; Except When They’re Not

E-Discovery LLC

16, 2024)(citing cases: “Defendants included general and boilerplate objections in their responses to discovery, which are not acceptable in this circuit. Defendants’ responses are a perfect example of how not to answer discovery requests. See General Objections, Dracula, and “Whac a Mole” (Apr.

article thumbnail

Does Every “Hit” on a “Hit Report” Have to be Produced?

E-Discovery LLC

The majority rule is based on the principle that all discovery is limited by concepts of relevance and proportionality, and that no litigant should be compelled to produce an irrelevant document merely because it “hit” on a keyword. In short, the scope of discovery limits what must be produced. See generally Jason R. 229 (2010).

Discovery 130
article thumbnail

Possession, Custody, or Control of Responsive Information by States Suing Meta

E-Discovery LLC

34 discovery requests propounded by defendant Meta Platforms, Inc., The choice of the test may, and often does, impact the outcome of a discovery dispute. The Social Media Adolescent Addiction court wrote: “Ultimately, the control issue under Rule 34 is governed by federal law. 467, 482-92 (2016).

Subpoenas 130