InHouseBlog
NOVEMBER 6, 2023
Eight years on from the last set of major changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) governing e-discovery, you might think that the practice of e-discovery had settled down into a comfortable status quo. And all of these platforms are fair game for discovery. To keep up, they have to learn from case law.
E-Discovery LLC
SEPTEMBER 14, 2024
It is sufficient to resolve the current discovery dispute to observe that Meta’s privilege log does not satisfy paragraph 1 of appendix 2 of the ESI Order, and Meta has not filed a motion asking for relief from those requirements. This blog was initially posted on Electronic Discovery Reference Model. ESI Order ¶ 10.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
E-Discovery LLC
SEPTEMBER 12, 2024
34 discovery requests propounded by defendant Meta Platforms, Inc., The choice of the test may, and often does, impact the outcome of a discovery dispute. The Social Media Adolescent Addiction court wrote: “Ultimately, the control issue under Rule 34 is governed by federal law. 467, 482-92 (2016).
Next Generation E-Discovery Law & Tech Blog
OCTOBER 17, 2024
Swedish Covenant Hosp. : “The discovery rules are not a ticket to an unlimited, never-ending exploration of every conceivable matter that captures an attorney’s interest. Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cole began the order by quoting Vakharia v. Parties are entitled to a reasonable opportunity to investigate the facts—and no more.”
Lawmatics
JANUARY 23, 2024
Advanced algorithms can quickly analyze vast legal information databases, statutes, and case law to provide relevant and up-to-date information. Predictive analytics: AI can predict case outcomes based on historical data to help lawyers and legal professionals make more informed decisions about case strategy and settlement options.
Discovery Advocate
JUNE 8, 2023
Relying on an employee’s memory without an accompanying thorough discussion – informed by potentially relevant technical considerations of where data may reside and a more robust effort to locate it – is unlikely to constitute a “reasonable search” for purposes of defending a response to a request for non-objectionable discovery.
Discovery Advocate
JUNE 7, 2023
Relying on an employee’s memory without an accompanying thorough discussion – informed by potentially relevant technical considerations of where data may reside and a more robust effort to locate it – is unlikely to constitute a “reasonable search” for purposes of defending a response to a request for non-objectionable discovery.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
93 
Let's personalize your content