Remove Burden Of Proof Remove Cross-Examination Remove Witnesses
article thumbnail

CONSIDER A TRIAL CHECKLIST

Plaintiff Trial Lawyer Tips

Opening statement, witness examination & summation Depositions  Review all depositions & index for access at trial  Create summary of relevant testimony with index to access at trial  Decide how to use at trial. .  Index & make summary of relevant information for use at trial. Decide how to use at trial.

article thumbnail

How to Prepare for Your First Mock Trial

Jonathan Leach LLC

This includes case briefs, witness statements, exhibits, and relevant statutes or legal precedents. Summarize the facts, jot down key points from witness statements, and organize notes for easy reference later. Then, clarify the burden of proof for each side. Plan your direct and cross-examinations of witnesses.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

POLARIZE THE CASE

Temple University Beasley School of Law - Advocacy

In one iteration of his “Ten Commandments” lecture on cross-examination, the famed advocacy teacher Irving Younger posited that ‘less is more.’ When showing a witness’ bias, you need not call them out as a liar; instead, simply argue in closing “and the witness, who testified for the defendant – it’s their mother.”

article thumbnail

Defense Lawyer REFUSES to Make Opening Arguments at Beginning of Medical Malpractice Trial. Can He Do That?

Gerry Oginski's New York Legal Blog

What will they say when they take the witness stand? In law we call that 'the burden of proof' You're accusing your doctor of malpractice. Show your proof. They could sit back and simply cross-examine each witness you put on. What can and can't she do now? Show your evidence.

article thumbnail

Federal Rule of Evidence 702: A Useful Rule (When It's Followed)

Evidence at Trial

Another judge, likewise citing Daubert , might admit the opinion because "[v]igorous cross-examination, presentation of contrary evidence, and careful instruction on the burden of proof are the traditional and appropriate means of attacking shaky but admissible evidence." 579, 589 (1993). at 596 (emphasis added).