E-Discovery LLC

MARCH 3, 2025

9, 2023)(Courts have recognized that sanctions may be imposed for improperly obtaining evidence.). It wrote: Pursuant to its inherent authority, the Court will strike the improperly used material from the pleadings, and Campbell will be barred from using it as evidence in this litigation, except for purposes of rebuttal or impeachment.

Evidence 130

Evidence Discovery Affidavits Pleadings 130

E-Discovery LLC

DECEMBER 16, 2024

26, 2024)(unreported), dismissals for discovery violations were affirmed. Nguh, one owner, propounded discovery on Mr. Etame, the opposing owner. The Appellate Court wrote: Mr. Etame failed to respond to discovery, and on March 3, 2022, Ms. Etame appealed, arguing abuse of discretion in the imposition of discovery sanctions.

Discovery 130

Discovery Interrogatories Affidavits Pleadings 130

E-Discovery LLC

JANUARY 28, 2025

24, 2025), the court imposed sanctions on a pro se litigant who, in the courts words, has engaged in unseemly behavior towards counsel as well as improper discovery litigation. He alleged discrepancies in the timestamps of some of the emails produced by Costco as part of the discovery. Rivera was filing meritless discovery motions.

Discovery 130

Discovery Expert Testimony Affidavits Evidence 130

E-Discovery LLC

JULY 8, 2024

Plaintiffs moved to compel production of documents after an in-person meet and confer to attempt resolution, and after counsel “ participated in an informal discovery conference with the undersigned’s Judicial Law Clerk regarding the dispute. ” Wallace, “Discovery of Government Documents and the Official Information Privilege,” 76 Colum.

Affidavits 130

Affidavits Discovery Objections Evidence 130

E-Discovery LLC

APRIL 14, 2025

Hall’s claims arise from the Defendants alleged concealment of exculpatory evidence and coercion of witness testimony during Mr. Halls 1992 murder trial. No Privilege Log is Necessary in Limited Circumstances When Discovery Requests Are Overbroad (Apr. This blog was initially posted on Electronic Discovery Reference Model.

Subpoenas 130

Subpoenas Discovery Witnesses Depositions 130

E-Discovery LLC

OCTOBER 6, 2024

But, the Court found and held that there was no evidence that the defendants had read the emails after plaintiff’s termination. The Court rejected invasion of privacy and wiretap claims because there was no evidence that the employer had read the emails after the plaintiff was terminated. Shapiro’s post-termination emails.”

Evidence 130

Evidence Litigation Discovery Affidavits 130

Next Generation E-Discovery Law & Tech Blog

AUGUST 30, 2023

By John Patzakis The Best Evidence Rule, as codified in Federal Rule of Evidence 1002, provides that an original writing, recording, or photograph is required to prove the contents of the document. The plaintiff had deleted his Facebook account resulting in lost evidence critical to the case.

Evidence 52

Evidence Jury Instructions Discovery Affidavits 52