Expert Witness Blog
JANUARY 30, 2025
2010), the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan addressed the admissibility of testimony from an electrical engineering expert witness in a subrogation claim following a house fire. In the case of Meemic Insurance Co. Hewlett-Packard Co. , 2d 752 (E.D.
Expert Witness Blog
MARCH 10, 2025
2024), the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois addressed the admissibility of expert testimony in a multidistrict litigation (MDL) concerning allegations that exposure to the herbicide paraquat caused plaintiffs to develop Parkinson’s disease.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Expert Witness Blog
FEBRUARY 23, 2025
2022), the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania addressed critical issues concerning product liability and the admissibility of expert testimony in a lawsuit stemming from a scaffold-related injury. The involvement of a Ladders & Scaffolds Expert Witness was central to the court’s analysis.
E-Discovery LLC
DECEMBER 11, 2024
The Rouse case involved claims against a company that manufactures and sells industrial adhesives, sealants, and other specialty materials. Since the Courts actions so far have apparently been too tepid, the Court will resort to sterner tools going forward. 2024 WL 4528872, at *1 (D. Fed.R.Civ.P. 1) In General.
Expert Witness Blog
MAY 24, 2024
The plaintiff claims that he was injured while using a miter saw manufactured by the defendant and purchased from Home Depot. The defendants allege that Dr. Benedict is not qualified to offer an opinion about miter saw design and manufacture, product warnings and instructions. Home Depot USA, Inc.
Expert Witness Blog
MAY 29, 2024
The plaintiff alleges that the defendant General Motors should be held liable for injuries she sustained after being injured in an accident involving a Silverado, manufactured by GM. The court opined that these arguments go to the weight of the evidence, not their admissibility.
Temple University Beasley School of Law - Advocacy
NOVEMBER 9, 2023
As reported, the Judge’s OPINION concluded that “the testimony of the expert was unreliable because there are no scientific principles underlying or supporting Agent (John) O’Neil’s opinions that would render such testimony reliable and thus admissible.” [link] (last visited July 18, 2023). Genrich, ORDER, July 7, 2023.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content