Admissibility Evidence Interrogatories 
E-Discovery LLC
FEBRUARY 25, 2025
19, 2025)(Emphasis added), the court wrote: Throughout his responses, Canales objects to OPWs requests on the ground that they are not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. See Reasonably Calculated to Lead to Discovery of Admissible Evidence (Nov. citation omitted]. accord Avila v.
E-Discovery LLC
OCTOBER 9, 2024
26(b)(1)states: The former provision for discovery of relevant but inadmissible information that appears “reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence” is also deleted. It is replaced by the direct statement that “Information within this scope of discovery need not be admissible in evidence to be discoverable.”
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
E-Discovery LLC
OCTOBER 2, 2024
26(b)(1), “[r]elevant information need not be admissible at trial if the discovery appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.” It is replaced by the direct statement that ‘Information within this scope of discovery need not be admissible in evidence to be discoverable.’”
E-Discovery LLC
SEPTEMBER 25, 2024
The document requests and interrogatories at issue plainly seek information to which Plaintiffs are entitled, and Wiegand cannot seriously contend that the information is not relevant. Wiegand’s argument that the requested information would not be admissible under Fed.R.Evid. For instance, Request No. sled at Wisp.”
E-Discovery LLC
SEPTEMBER 16, 2024
Information within this scope of discovery need not be admissible in evidence to be discoverable.” Similarly, identification of details of transactions in response to Interrogatory No. 11 is unduly burdensome where the account statements have been produced.”
E-Discovery LLC
JUNE 25, 2024
c)(2) contentions, in reviewing the briefs and exhibits, it is evident that the communication issues addressed in the court’s January 11, 2024 order have not been resolved. at *5-6, passim , as well as contention interrogatories, id. The Norcold court addressed a number of other issues. [1] at *6, among other issues.
E-Discovery LLC
OCTOBER 17, 2024
The court: set out the governing standard for discovery from an attorney and, denied a request to depose the attorney; but, authorized a limited interrogatory to him. The defendants, a Town and others , denied knowledge of the alleged offer. The plaintiffs wanted to develop certain property that they owned. emphasis added]. See Fed.R.Evid.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
130 
Let's personalize your content