Admissibility Cross-Examination Evidence 
E-Discovery LLC
JUNE 5, 2024
While there were many issues on appeal, one was whether evidence of her internet searches related to termination of a pregnancy was properly admitted on the facts presented. The decision to admit that evidence was affirmed by the intermediate appellate court. Examination showed otherwise and she reported that the baby was stillborn.
Evidence at Trial
MARCH 30, 2023
Lee Bailey—polite and charismatic with a sprinkling of zinger cross-exam questions that would hit bullseye every time. But in this he-said-she-said ski collision case, where the jury must accept one party’s version of events and reject the other, the skill of the examiner is important. The victim? Paltrow, good morning.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Jonathan Leach LLC
AUGUST 7, 2024
This involves reviewing all available documents, evidence, and witness statements. A good lawyer will create a case theory based on the case’s evidence and legal principles and present it clearly and concisely. Organize and Manage Evidence Efficiently organizing and managing evidence is crucial.
Jonathan Leach LLC
JUNE 10, 2024
Discuss which side needs to prove what and what the standards of evidence are needed. Use all evidence (documents, photographs, physical evidence, and expert reports) to support your case. Create a Case Outline your case, including the key points you need to prove, the evidence you will present, and the witnesses you will call.
E-Discovery LLC
MAY 27, 2024
The trial judge stated: “And certainly if you [defense counsel] want a little break to investigate him, to examine him, meaning outside of the courtroom, you know, to in any way interview him to prepare for the cross-examination, the Court would be happy to give you time to do that in an abundance of caution.” Rule 4-263(n).
WA Bar News
JULY 10, 2024
The Task Force was directed to “examine current and past bar examination methods, passage rates, and alternative licensure methods, assess disproportionate impacts on examinees of color and first generation examinees, consider the need for alternatives to the current bar exam, and analyze those potential alternatives.” SIDEBAR No.
Expert Witness Blog
MAY 24, 2024
The court notes that it is concerned with admissibility, not the credibility of Dr. Benedict or the weight of his testimony. The court opines that the defendants should use cross-examination to argue against Dr. Benedict’s methodology. Benedict’s opinions are not reliable by attacking his methodology.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
130 
Let's personalize your content