Admissibility Court Rules Litigation 
SW&L Attorneys Blog
JUNE 18, 2024
From navigating convoluted regulatory frameworks to managing extensive discovery processes, the reality of litigation can overwhelm even the most prepared enterprises. Secured from the supreme court a certificate of admission to the bar of this state; and 2.
Complex Discovery
SEPTEMBER 11, 2024
Understanding how courts may handle AI-generated evidence will be crucial for those responsible for managing digital content, ensuring data integrity, and navigating complex litigation involving digital forensics. Ongoing Training: Legal professionals, judges, and juries need education on AI and its potential impact on evidence.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Next Generation E-Discovery Law & Tech Blog
AUGUST 30, 2023
In fact, given the unfortunately extensive but erroneous reliance on screenshots of social media evidence, The Best Evidence Rule could be cited far more frequently by opposing counsel seeking to contest the admission of such evidence. A case out of the federal courts in Texas addressed this issue head on.
Evidence at Trial
MARCH 22, 2023
When asked to explain how, the defense attorney stated that in future cases, "the defendants' attorneys will simply ask the court to take judicial notice of the [expert witness'] testimony." Most litigators are generally familiar with the concept of judicial notice. Must-Know Rule #4: Judicial Notice's High Standard v.
WA Bar News
JULY 10, 2024
THESE NOTICES OF THE IMPOSITION OF DISCIPLINARY SANCTIONS AND ACTIONS are published pursuant to Rule 3.5(c) c) of the Washington Supreme Court Rules for Enforcement of Lawyer Conduct. The lawyer’s conduct violated the following Rules of Professional Conduct: 1.3 Expediting Litigation), 3.3 Diligence), 1.4
Evidence at Trial
NOVEMBER 27, 2021
Longo had presented these test results through testimony and expert reports in other asbestos litigation against J&J. Accordingly, to the extend Dr. Fitzgerald (and other experts) relied on Dr. Longo, "the [trial] court ruled that their opinions were inadmissible case-specific hearsay under [ People v.
Evidence at Trial
JANUARY 30, 2023
When it comes to hearsay exceptions in California, litigators will instinctively (and appropriately) consider the code sections found in Division 10 of the Evidence Code ( i.e. , Section 1200 et seq. ). Party admission? Mr. Lawley argued that the above statements were admissible as declarations against interest (Cal.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
82 
Let's personalize your content