Remove Admissibility Remove Court Rules Remove Discovery
article thumbnail

Admissibility of Internet Searches About Terminating Pregnancy

E-Discovery LLC

The Court ruled for the State. RELEVANCE OF THE INTERNET SEARCHES After discussing other issues, the Court turned to the evidence of internet searches related to abortion.

article thumbnail

Do I Need An Attorney? Legal Considerations For Business Owners In North Dakota

SW&L Attorneys Blog

From navigating convoluted regulatory frameworks to managing extensive discovery processes, the reality of litigation can overwhelm even the most prepared enterprises. Secured from the supreme court a certificate of admission to the bar of this state; and 2.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Best Evidence Rule Requires Post-Level Collection for Social Media Evidence

Next Generation E-Discovery Law & Tech Blog

In fact, given the unfortunately extensive but erroneous reliance on screenshots of social media evidence, The Best Evidence Rule could be cited far more frequently by opposing counsel seeking to contest the admission of such evidence. A case out of the federal courts in Texas addressed this issue head on.

article thumbnail

From Evidence to Misinformation: Courts Brace for Deepfake Challenges

Complex Discovery

Key recommendations include: Pretrial Evidentiary Hearings: Judges should require early disclosure of potential deepfake-related evidence, enabling discovery and the use of expert witnesses to authenticate digital materials. For eDiscovery professionals, the stakes are particularly high.

article thumbnail

Maryland’s New and Improved Unreported Opinion Rule Does Not Go Far Enough

E-Discovery LLC

Stuart, “Privacy in Discovery After Dobbs,” 26 Va. As of this writing, undersigned counsel is aware of 45 unreported opinions in the 9 years since unreported decisions of the Appellate Court became available electronically where a criminal defendant challenged admission of video footage on authentication grounds. & Tech.

Precedent 130
article thumbnail

July/Aug. 2024 > Discipline & Other Notices

WA Bar News

THESE NOTICES OF THE IMPOSITION OF DISCIPLINARY SANCTIONS AND ACTIONS are published pursuant to Rule 3.5(c) c) of the Washington Supreme Court Rules for Enforcement of Lawyer Conduct. The lawyer’s conduct violated the following Rules of Professional Conduct: 1.3 Bar Admission and Disciplinary Matters), 8.4(b)

article thumbnail

Understanding Jury Duty and Misconduct in the Legal Arena

Jury Analyst

Ignoring Admissibility of Evidence Sometimes jurors consider evidence the court has ruled inadmissible, casting doubt on their verdicts. Should this dismissal of court authority surface during lesser-known cases, it can still set a precedent for legal disputes and challenge the efficacy of the judicial system.