WA Bar News

JUNE 11, 2024

THESE NOTICES OF THE IMPOSITION OF DISCIPLINARY SANCTIONS AND ACTIONS are published pursuant to Rule 3.5(c) c) of the Washington Supreme Court Rules for Enforcement of Lawyer Conduct. The lawyer’s conduct violated the following Rules of Professional Conduct: 1.3 Bar Admission and Disciplinary Matters) , 8.4(c)

Depositions 52

Depositions Admissibility Court Rules 52

WA Bar News

DECEMBER 17, 2024

THESE NOTICES OF THE IMPOSITION OF DISCIPLINARY SANCTIONS AND ACTIONS are published pursuant to Rule 3.5(c) c) of the Washington Supreme Court Rules for Enforcement of Lawyer Conduct. The Statement of Alleged Misconduct reflects the following violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct: 1.2 Diligence), 1.4

Admissibility 52

Admissibility Depositions Court Rules Litigation 52

Evidence at Trial

NOVEMBER 27, 2021

The Court explained that “[b]ecause of this shared geological provenance, asbestos is often found intergrown as an ‘accessory mineral’ within a talc deposit.” With these gaps and ostensible evidentiary problems, the trial court granted J&J's motion for summary judgment, and the Strobels appealed.

Evidence 52

Evidence Witnesses Jury Instructions Objections 52

WA Bar News

JULY 10, 2024

THESE NOTICES OF THE IMPOSITION OF DISCIPLINARY SANCTIONS AND ACTIONS are published pursuant to Rule 3.5(c) c) of the Washington Supreme Court Rules for Enforcement of Lawyer Conduct. The lawyer’s conduct violated the following Rules of Professional Conduct: 1.3 Bar Admission and Disciplinary Matters), 8.4(b)

Real Estate 52

Real Estate Depositions Evidence Admissibility 52