Complex Discovery

SEPTEMBER 11, 2024

Familiarity with the technology will help courts make informed decisions about the admissibility and reliability of digital materials. Ongoing Training: Legal professionals, judges, and juries need education on AI and its potential impact on evidence.

Evidence 111

Evidence Media and Entertainment Jury Deliberation Technology 111

Next Generation E-Discovery Law & Tech Blog

AUGUST 30, 2023

In fact, given the unfortunately extensive but erroneous reliance on screenshots of social media evidence, The Best Evidence Rule could be cited far more frequently by opposing counsel seeking to contest the admission of such evidence. A case out of the federal courts in Texas addressed this issue head on.

Evidence 52

Evidence Jury Instructions Discovery Affidavits 52

Practice of Law

SEPTEMBER 5, 2024

Watkins appealed the conviction to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. He raised several objections on appeal, but we’ll focus on two: his challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence and to the admission of his song lyrics as evidence. All in all, the court of appeals let the conviction stand.

Evidence 40

Evidence Admissibility Objections Pleadings 40

Evidence at Trial

NOVEMBER 27, 2021

Accordingly, to the extend Dr. Fitzgerald (and other experts) relied on Dr. Longo, "the [trial] court ruled that their opinions were inadmissible case-specific hearsay under [ People v. The Court agreed that Dr. Longo's testing constituted inadmissible hearsay barred by People v.

Evidence 52

Evidence Witnesses Jury Instructions Objections 52

WA Bar News

DECEMBER 17, 2024

THESE NOTICES OF THE IMPOSITION OF DISCIPLINARY SANCTIONS AND ACTIONS are published pursuant to Rule 3.5(c) c) of the Washington Supreme Court Rules for Enforcement of Lawyer Conduct. The Statement of Alleged Misconduct reflects the following violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct: 1.2 Diligence), 1.4

Admissibility 52

Admissibility Depositions Court Rules Litigation 52

WA Bar News

JUNE 11, 2024

THESE NOTICES OF THE IMPOSITION OF DISCIPLINARY SANCTIONS AND ACTIONS are published pursuant to Rule 3.5(c) c) of the Washington Supreme Court Rules for Enforcement of Lawyer Conduct. The lawyer’s conduct violated the following Rules of Professional Conduct: 1.3 Bar Admission and Disciplinary Matters) , 8.4(c)

Depositions 52

Depositions Admissibility Court Rules 52

Ethicking

JUNE 14, 2024

Monday’s ex parte meeting allegedly expanded on that, and Copeland testified (and per his own admission, lied) on Tuesday. Per Rule 2.9 Of course, it depends—generally, lawyers are required to cooperate with the judge and abide by court rules and orders. However, Rule 3.4 Problems abound here.

Witnesses 52

Witnesses Subpoenas Admissibility Court Rules 52

Evidence at Trial

MARCH 22, 2023

Must-Know Rule #2: A Substitute for Evidence Cannot Bypass Relevance Like any rule of evidence, the details mustn't swallow the whole. Just because something is judicially noticeable does not mean it's admissible. American Prairie involved an appeal of a district court ruling that found John Hoich personally liable for $2.5

Evidence 52

Evidence Witnesses Hearsay Rule Admissibility 52

WA Bar News

JULY 10, 2024

THESE NOTICES OF THE IMPOSITION OF DISCIPLINARY SANCTIONS AND ACTIONS are published pursuant to Rule 3.5(c) c) of the Washington Supreme Court Rules for Enforcement of Lawyer Conduct. The lawyer’s conduct violated the following Rules of Professional Conduct: 1.3 Bar Admission and Disciplinary Matters), 8.4(b)

Real Estate 52

Real Estate Depositions Evidence Admissibility 52

E-Discovery LLC

JUNE 5, 2024

The Court ruled for the State. RELEVANCE OF THE INTERNET SEARCHES After discussing other issues, the Court turned to the evidence of internet searches related to abortion.

Admissibility 130

Admissibility Evidence Voir Dire Objections 130

Evidence at Trial

JANUARY 30, 2023

Party admission? In addition to knowing the enumerated exceptions, trial lawyers must know an as-important hearsay exception found outside this list: the rule of completeness. Mr. Lawley argued that the above statements were admissible as declarations against interest (Cal. The Court affirmed the trial court’s rulings.

Admissibility 52

Admissibility Evidence Witnesses Court Rules 52

Joseph, Hollander & Craft

MARCH 7, 2025

However, many people do not realize that the procedural rule requiring police to expressly advise arrestees of their rights did not apply until a series of landmark 1960s Supreme Court cases, culminating in Miranda v. This admission came after 14 hours of questioning and being denied access to his lawyer. Arizona, 384 U.S.

Admissibility 52

Admissibility Evidence Witnesses Court Rules 52

E-Discovery LLC

JUNE 1, 2024

As of this writing, undersigned counsel is aware of 45 unreported opinions in the 9 years since unreported decisions of the Appellate Court became available electronically where a criminal defendant challenged admission of video footage on authentication grounds. That court has not reversed in any case. emphasis added].

Precedent 130

Precedent Discovery Admissibility Litigation 130

Forensic Psychologist

AUGUST 14, 2016

Supreme Court rulings, such offenders must have a mental disorder in order to qualify for prolonged detention after they have served their prison terms. “It Under a 2012 New York appellate court ruling in the case of State v. The ruling in State v. But that could be years down the road. -

Construction 52

Construction Evidence Court Rules Admissibility 52

Jury Analyst

MAY 22, 2024

Ignoring Admissibility of Evidence Sometimes jurors consider evidence the court has ruled inadmissible, casting doubt on their verdicts. Should this dismissal of court authority surface during lesser-known cases, it can still set a precedent for legal disputes and challenge the efficacy of the judicial system.

Evidence 40

Evidence Jury Deliberation Jury Selection Jury Instructions 40

Jury Analyst

MAY 22, 2024

Ignoring Admissibility of Evidence Sometimes jurors consider evidence the court has ruled inadmissible, casting doubt on their verdicts. Should this dismissal of court authority surface during lesser-known cases, it can still set a precedent for legal disputes and challenge the efficacy of the judicial system.

Evidence 40

Evidence Jury Deliberation Jury Selection Jury Instructions 40