article thumbnail

Is a “Composite” Video Admissible and Can a Police Officer “Narrate” It at Trial? – Part 1 of 2

E-Discovery LLC

This first blog addresses the admissibility of a “composite” video prepared by the prosecution. Second , while the source materials “need not be introduced into evidence,” they must be “otherwise admissible.” An innocent bystander was fatally shot while she was with her husband on a hotel patio in Annapolis. 1003 and 1005.

article thumbnail

Patent Office Implements Changes to Requirements for Admissions Criteria for Patent Bar

IP Watchdog

The Office said at the time it planned to “expand the admission criteria of our patent bar to encourage broader participation and to keep up with the ever-evolving technology and related teachings that qualify someone to practice before the USPTO.”

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Is Marking Documents as “Work Product” an Admission that the Duty to Preserve is Triggered?

E-Discovery LLC

In Stuart v. County of Riverside , 2024 WL 3086634, at *3 (C.D. 14, 2024), the District Court found a relationship between work product designations and triggering of the common-law duty to preserve. The point at which the duty to preserve has been triggered is central to any subsequent spoliation issue. 17, 2021).

article thumbnail

Is a “Composite” Video Admissible and Can a Police Officer “Narrate” It at Trial? – Part 2 of 2

E-Discovery LLC

A prior blog addressed the admissibility of a “composite” video prepared by the prosecution. State , 261 Md. 499 (2024), addressed introduction of a “composite” video as summary evidence and the use of police officers’ testimony describing it. This second blog will address the use of a police officer to narrate the composite video at trial.

article thumbnail

Harvard Suit Blaming Marsh for Its $15M Insurance Denial Filed Too Late, Judge Rules

Insurance Journal

After losing two bids to recover $15 million from its insurer for costs related to its failed legal defense of its admissions policy, Harvard University has now failed in a bid to hold its insurance broker Marsh responsible. A federal …

article thumbnail

Maryland State Bar Association Republishes Blog

E-Discovery LLC

Thanks again to the Maryland State Bar Association for publishing my blog – – Admissibility of Internet Searches About Terminating Pregnancy | Maryland State Bar Association (msba.org) Please also see Thanks to Md. State Bar Association – E-Discovery LLC (ediscoveryllc.com) for other republished blogs.

article thumbnail

Is a Vehicle’s “On Board” or “Dash Cam” Video Protected From Disclosure as “Work Product?”

E-Discovery LLC

26(b)(1), “[r]elevant information need not be admissible at trial if the discovery appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.” It is replaced by the direct statement that ‘Information within this scope of discovery need not be admissible in evidence to be discoverable.’”